Yesterday, 03:17 PM
This post was last modified Yesterday, 03:18 PM by Maxmars.
Edit Reason: grammar
Lacking more input from the court, I can't really understand this reversal.
I can't imagine a meaningful reason to reverse the conviction.
This just implies "wrongful accusation."
I would blame the prosecution, if I cared enough; I would blame the Judiciary, if my opinion mattered at all.
I just needed to express that odd feeling you get when "closure" is -erased- by decree.
There is another world where a conviction is not a 'virtue signal,' isn't there?
I can't imagine a meaningful reason to reverse the conviction.
This just implies "wrongful accusation."
I would blame the prosecution, if I cared enough; I would blame the Judiciary, if my opinion mattered at all.
I just needed to express that odd feeling you get when "closure" is -erased- by decree.
There is another world where a conviction is not a 'virtue signal,' isn't there?
