"Say it to my face!"

[theshadowknows]

Harris Challenges Trump "Say It to My Face" at the Debate

At a lively rally in Atlanta, Vice President Kamala Harris energized supporters, emphasizing the importance of the next 98 days before the election. She criticized Donald Trump for wavering on their debate, questioning his reluctance to face her directly, and mocked his running mate, JD Vance, calling their policies backward, outdated, and dangerous. Now the likely Democratic nominee, Harris has reignited hope for an expanded electoral map. The event showcased her appeal to young people, women, and non-white voters. Harris promised to pass voting rights legislation and restore abortion rights.

Source: AP

[FlyersFan]

"say it to my face".
Like Trump is scared to do that?
He's a bloviating loudmouth and has no trouble 'saying it to her face'.
She's trying to sound tough and like Trump is scared of her.
But that doesn't fly.

Unfortunately she's going to win.
And she'll usher in her Communist policies
all while hugging Hamas.

Pretty damn sad choices America has in this election.

I was all set to go Libertarian, but he turns out to be worse than
Trump, Harris, and RFK JR.   YIKES!!

[RuchardHurt]

"say it to my face".
Like Trump is scared to do that?
He's a bloviating loudmouth and has no trouble 'saying it to her face'.
She's trying to sound tough and like Trump is scared of her.
But that doesn't fly.

Unfortunately she's going to win.
And she'll usher in her Communist policies
all while hugging Hamas.

Pretty damn sad choices America has in this election.

I was all set to go Libertarian, but he turns out to be worse than
Trump, Harris, and RFK JR.   YIKES!!

So then why is Mr. Trump reluctant to give a definitive answer on debating her? Your claim that he has no problem doesn't line up with his current position.
I think Harris is doing just fine and getting a boost from all the attacks.

[Maxmars]

So then why is Mr. Trump reluctant to give a definitive answer on debating her? ...

Perhaps he is concerned about people dying, not "knowing" who, exactly, was behind the first failed assassination attempt...  Nahhh... it'll be fine, right?

[RuchardHurt]

Perhaps he is concerned about people dying, not "knowing" who, exactly, was behind the first failed assassination attempt...  Nahhh... it'll be fine, right?

That is a good point but not an excuse. The risk of an attempt doesn't just end. That threat will always be persistent for high profile figures.

[FlyersFan]

So then why is Mr. Trump reluctant to give a definitive answer on debating her? 

He did.  He said he'd debate after the DNC when it was firmed up who exactly the ticket would be.  And he said he wants to debate 'many times'.   That's as definitive as you can get when Harris isn't even the nominee yet.  

I'm not a Trump fan, so I'm not blindly defending him.  But it's really clear that the GOP ticket is just waiting for the Democrats to get their act together and make a solid choice.  

The thing people forget is that Trump still has to go through sentencing for that sham conviction in NYC.  If he gets jail time or if he gets house arrest ... which is likely since this entire case is just election interference and they'll keep interfering with locking Trump up ... then there probably won't be any debates and it'll be on the democrats who caused it with their lawfare.

[Lysergic]

boring

these politician aint bout getting gritty some PR person told her to say that.

womp womp womp

[RuchardHurt]

boring

these politician aint bout getting gritty some PR person told her to say that.

womp womp womp

I was unaware that you and K are buddies buddies.
It's very refreshing to know we have someone on the inside to speak on her behalf.
Perhaps you can tell others here what she really would've said.

[Maxmars]

Let's skip jabbing at each other for the moment, and tell me...

Don't you think that an image and history of competence is a vital and necessary component for the position of Executive and Chief of a nation?

Aside from flexible historical media, and partisan garbage, who better brings that to the table?

(No cackling please - no bloviating.)

[RuchardHurt]

Let's skip jabbing at each other for the moment, and tell me...

Don't you think that an image and history of competence is a vital and necessary component for the position of Executive and Chief of a nation?

Aside from flexible historical media, and partisan garbage, who better brings that to the table?

(No cackling please - no bloviating.)

I witnessed a former POTUS claim to hire "top, top people" and to fill his admin with only "the best and most serious people.”
That was clearly a lie and shows a massive character flaw that should bebtaken into consideration. Yet for some reason is always overlooked. Possibly due to short term memory loss and people want for instant gratification.
K is no different as she herself has had many issues almost as severe as her opponent, but she was not the POTUS.