11-23-2024, 02:53 PM
No one cares about this discussion but I am going to post this anyway. From the Harvard Political Review:
The Case for Sortition in America
I suppose it's more profitable to have a political system that feeds on division, amplifies inequality, and acts to make individuals atomized and powerless.
The Case for Sortition in America
Quote:...The political realities of 2020 have laid bare that these flaws are structural to American democracy itself and have existed since its founding. Our system is not broken; it is functioning exactly as was intended. The system was always built around undemocratic institutions. The Electoral College, which allowed President Trump to be elected despite losing the popular vote, was created to protect the interests of slaveholding aristocrats in the South. Members of Congress are able to sustain decades-long careers in Congress despite consistently low approval ratings because of millions of dollars in lawful donations from Wall Street firms — donations which were made legal in the first place by a 5-4 decision from the nine lifetime-appointed justices on the Supreme Court. None of the undemocratic systems governing us today are subversions of the Constitution. On the contrary, they are all perfectly legal.
How, then, do we save American democracy? Sortition.
In simplest terms, sortition means appointment by lottery. In America, sortition would mean replacing Congress with assemblies made up of randomly chosen American citizens; elected representatives are entirely eliminated. Almost every responsibility of the legislative branch is delegated to a randomly subset of the population. Laws are written, discussed, and passed by ordinary people. Federal judges are interviewed and confirmed by ordinary people....
I suppose it's more profitable to have a political system that feeds on division, amplifies inequality, and acts to make individuals atomized and powerless.
"I cannot give you what you deny yourself. Look for solutions from within." - Kai Opaka