Epstein Archive
 



  • 2 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RIP Francis
#21
(04-21-2025, 12:08 PM)Encia22 Wrote: I can't find any reference to a future 'Latino' Pope in the article you posted.

The article said Nostrodamus had said a pope of dark skin.
So I said this would mean black .. or a dark skinned Latino.
That could also fit.
Dark skin doesn't always mean 'black'.
My adopted daughter is from Bolivia.
In the summers when she was a child she would be darker than the 'black' kids in the neighborhood.
make russia small again
Don't be a useful idiot.  Deny Ignorance.
 
Reply
#22
(04-21-2025, 09:00 AM)Compendium Wrote: Everyone is overlooking the significance of Pope Francis dying on Easter Monday

Marking an opposing "anti-cycle" of the "Christ resurrection" ("Christ" meaning "Cycle")

This is because he is the final Pope of Pisces

His dying at the exact end of a celebration which marked the start of the Piscean cycle, means the "Fishermans" astronomical cycle has ended

The conclusion of the Piscean cycle marks the "passover" of the astronomical house of the Piscean fisherman, into the house of the Aquarian water-bearer

"When you find a man bearing a pitcher of water, follow him into the house where he enters"

The new Aeon of Aquarius the water-bearer has started

The Aeon of the fisherman has ended

The Church cannot continue in the Aquarian age, without producing an updated theology

This means new volumes on the compendium (a new, new Testament)

A Testament of works for the compendium needs be produced for each Aeon

Are they sure this time? The 60s Age of Aquarius only lasted until 1973.

Pieces:

Quote:the rise of Christianity with Jesus's baptism in the river symbolizing the dissolving of the ego into faith, and the Piscean values of universal love and brotherhood

Aquarius:

Quote:These include innovation, communication, humanitarianism, and a spirit of rebellion against the status quo. The age is also expected to bring about significant shifts in societal structures, personal identity, and a stronger emphasis on community and global collaboration.

People are going to fight the globalist inclusive snowflakes, and ARE fighting the age of globalist inclusive snowflakes.

Does it mention anything about an Aeonic-crossover period where it takes an obscene amount of time for one age of awareness to dissolve into the next?

To the topic what does an Aquarian Pope look like? What Pope leads the most prominent Christian denomination and church into the new Aeon?

Its marked by rebellion against status quo + identity indivualism + global collaboration. Seems like the Episcopalians got this nailed. Do they follow the route of the Anglicans and even Methodists?

And I agree with you that religion needs to adapt to continue into this Aeon (and it has), but what you may not agree with is what direction it needs to go to qualify as "aeon transitioning."

Mainly because I think "woke" is closer to the mindset that accompanies the Aeon of Aquarius. I think the world goes left by natural occurence.

I also think it marks a return to parable from absolute narrative, meaning religions throttle back the damnation and fear tactics and return to emphasis on individual transformation using scripture as a guide.

The age of church/state separation.

Religion in Aquarius is one of secularism and universal tolerance for individual identity. The new Pope has to take it the Episcopal Cathredral in June route to help the church transition.

[Image: Screenshot_20250421_105522_Google.jpg]
[Image: New-sig-V6.69.jpg][Image: Screenshot_20250212_223830_Sketchbook.jpg]



Reply
#23
(04-21-2025, 12:59 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: Are they sure this time? The 60s Age of Aquarius only lasted until 1973.

Pieces:


Aquarius:


People are going to fight the globalist inclusive snowflakes, and ARE fighting the age of globalist inclusive snowflakes.

Does it mention anything about an Aeonic-crossover period where it takes an obscene amount of time for one age of awareness to dissolve into the next?

To the topic what does an Aquarian Pope look like? What Pope leads the most prominent Christian denomination and church into the new Aeon?

Its marked by rebellion against status quo + identity indivualism + global collaboration. Seems like the Episcopalians got this nailed. Do they follow the route of the Anglicans and even Methodists?

And I agree with you that religion needs to adapt to continue into this Aeon (and it has), but what you may not agree with is what direction it needs to go to qualify as "aeon transitioning."

Mainly because I think "woke" is closer to the mindset that accompanies the Aeon of Aquarius. I think the world goes left by natural occurence.

I also think it marks a return to parable from absolute narrative, meaning religions throttle back the damnation and fear tactics and return to emphasis on indivual transformation using scripture as a guide.

Religion in the new aeon is one of secularism and universal tolerance for individual identity. The new Pope has to take it the Episcopal Cathredral in June route.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...Google.jpg]

It is also interesting that this Easter was one in which the Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church both observed the same day. That is rare, a sort of conjunction.
Reply
#24
The UN,  WEF , and other global organisations are slowly turning the Catholic Church into a very 'inclusive' 'welcoming' 'global' 'universalist' Church ,that is to say, into a non Catholic and very Marxist organisation, all on the way to create a (or attempt to create) a global religion for their idea of a global hell utopia under one culture.
Reply
#25
RIP Francis.
I didn't agree with much of what you said and often wondered how you got to be Pope....
But it's all between you and God now.
 
(04-21-2025, 04:29 AM)FlyersFan Wrote: If it's Pietro Parolin then that would fulfil the St. Malachy prophecy of 'Peter the Roman' following Pope Benedict ... and it would verify what many of us believe that 'Pope Francis" was not authentically elected and wasn't really the pope.   It would mean that Pietro Parolin is the last pope before 'the end' ...

Let's hope it's not him.
Sound like that one of the front runners from Hungary might be the best choice.....let me see if I can find that list

Here's another list
https://nypost.com/2025/04/21/world-news...-conclave/
Timor est magnus animus interfectorem!!!
Reply
#26
(04-21-2025, 09:00 AM)Compendium Wrote: The Church cannot continue in the Aquarian age, without producing an updated theology

They'd be better off eliminating Vatican II and starting fresh.
 



And an opinion  from Archbishop Vigano I can respect:  
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/arc...n=catholic
Quote:In 2018, Eugenio Scalfari reported the words that Bergoglio supposedly confided to him about his vision of the afterlife: 
Quote:“Sinful souls are not punished: those who repent obtain God’s forgiveness and join the ranks of souls who contemplate him, but those who do not repent and cannot therefore be forgiven disappear. There is no hell, sinful souls simply disappear.”
These heretical ravings are directly opposed to the Catholic Faith, which teaches us that there is a particular Judgment for everyone, which Bergoglio could not escape. His soul has therefore not disappeared, nor has it dissolved: he will have to account for the crimes he has committed, first of all having usurped the throne of Peter in order to destroy the Catholic Church and lose so many souls. 
Timor est magnus animus interfectorem!!!
Reply
#27
(04-21-2025, 12:59 PM)IdeomotorPrisoner Wrote: Are they sure this time? The 60s Age of Aquarius only lasted until 1973.

Pieces:


Aquarius:


People are going to fight the globalist inclusive snowflakes, and ARE fighting the age of globalist inclusive snowflakes.

Does it mention anything about an Aeonic-crossover period where it takes an obscene amount of time for one age of awareness to dissolve into the next?

To the topic what does an Aquarian Pope look like? What Pope leads the most prominent Christian denomination and church into the new Aeon?

Its marked by rebellion against status quo + identity indivualism + global collaboration. Seems like the Episcopalians got this nailed. Do they follow the route of the Anglicans and even Methodists?

And I agree with you that religion needs to adapt to continue into this Aeon (and it has), but what you may not agree with is what direction it needs to go to qualify as "aeon transitioning."

Mainly because I think "woke" is closer to the mindset that accompanies the Aeon of Aquarius. I think the world goes left by natural occurence.

I also think it marks a return to parable from absolute narrative, meaning religions throttle back the damnation and fear tactics and return to emphasis on individual transformation using scripture as a guide.

The age of church/state separation.

Religion in Aquarius is one of secularism and universal tolerance for individual identity. The new Pope has to take it the Episcopal Cathredral in June route to help the church transition.

[Image: https://denyignorance.com/uploader/image...Google.jpg]

The "woke" movement isn't new age. It's the opposite

It's a symptom of a collective resisting the dissolving of things like ego and deterministic will

Pisces is the age of the waters, which is internalisation. The initiated source of understanding of self within experience

It is to go into the water and "fish" for what is needed

The spiritual journey of those that seek the mysteries

This was perverted somewhat within what the Church ended up becoming, where the collectives of those that "seek" were taught to accept only what the Church offered, and seek no more

But convincing people to stop asking the question, is not the same as answering it

In many ways, the Churches forsake the principles of what The Piscean fisherman stood for

We were told very clearly that we were supposed to take up our own cross and follow the example

Yet everyone wants to go heaven, but none want to die

They seek to reap that which they never sew

It's crazy

What was supposed to understand within Pisces is the opposite of flawed woke ideologies, their posturing and attempts to define ones identity, as a means to convince themselves that they understand who they are

The woke mind-worm is no different to the corruption and sickness found within many of those who claim to be of God

In the same way that many believe they can define who, or what God is, or even believe they can speak for them ... The modern woke movement believes they can simply define themselves as something outside of common perception

Because they have convinced themselves that if they define it as so, it must be so

This is like naming the location you are at as your destination, to convince yourself that you aren't lost

Those that truly understand God, have no need to seek them daily in a book. They know it and understand it in everything they do. In everything that surrounds them

Just as those who truly just in the way they treat and respect others and the world around them, do not need to go out of their way to define how they support particular groups, demographics or minorities

Racism works the same within favoritism as it does within discrimination

They are all racists. Albeit a different flavour of the same old formula

If all you is see is defined by gender and race, you are likely sexist and racist by nature. You are merely overcompensating for something you are battling within yourself

Aquarius does not have any of these considerations. It is beyond illusions of ego and confusion within self projection and perception like identity and gender

What we are experiencing with the woke agenda, is the opposite of the collective awakening

The woke are, ironically, some of the most spiritually asleep people on Earth

They are children, who believe themselves adults. Sheep who think themselves shepherds

The Aquarian Pope would have to be not of their order. Essentially

Willing to tear everything down and start again

Not because he can't be aligned with them

But because the Vatican will seek to align the teachings to them, rather than align themselves to the teachings

And this will not work. Nobody will accept it

More and more people will reject the Church, because their teachings are dated and by such cannot provide the answers that people seek

The solution is not within infecting yourself with the disease or corruption, in order to try find it's cure

Simply ...

If they wish to hold onto the historical perception of the theology, they are going to be made to honour the much older traditions and teachings. In their original forms and translations

If they wish to adapt, then they are going to be made to return certain teachings to what they once were supposed to be, and accept the answers that need be given

They know exactly what they have to do. They are just scared of what will happen and how people will react if they do it

They are worried of what will happen if they go public and say, "Hey, we know we let you believe these certain things for thousands of years, but we actually have different understandings of certain things, and different translations of certain texts that we didn't tell you about all this time. Sorry"

They need to tell all that they know and keep hidden. In every form, even if it is inconvenient for them, or it goes against what they want people to believe

There are enough people in this world being taught the things they keep hidden now, that they will have no choice within a few years. Either they adapt and be honest, or they will fall in their own swords simply to prove them sharp
[Image: gn60d048d7.png]
Reply
#28
(04-21-2025, 03:59 PM)DontTreadOnMe Wrote: They'd be better off eliminating Vatican II and starting fresh.
 



And an opinion  from Archbishop Vigano I can respect:  
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/arc...n=catholic

Yes

They also need to establish a project concentrating on deciphering deeper needing within translated source material. Alternate translations, AI algorithmic sequencing of phonetic patterns. Semiotics. Morphology. Phonology

They are well aware the a majority of the Biblical texts are incorrectly translated

The fact they ignore this and make no effort to improve the translations and find deeper intended meaning and knowledge is criminal

They cannot purport themselves to be the conveyors of the ancient writings and wisdom, at the same time that they systematical forsake them
[Image: gn60d048d7.png]
Reply
#29
(04-21-2025, 09:24 PM)Compendium Wrote: Yes

They also need to establish a project concentrating on deciphering deeper needing within translated source material. Alternate translations, AI algorithmic sequencing of phonetic patterns. Semiotics. Morphology. Phonology

They are well aware the a majority of the Biblical texts are incorrectly translated

The fact they ignore this and make no effort to improve the translations and find deeper intended meaning and knowledge is criminal

They cannot purport themselves to be the conveyors of the ancient writings and wisdom, at the same time that they systematical forsake them

I wholeheartedly agree...

Could it be that linguistics can only provide a better image of the Word... not reshape it's meaning?

Such matters are for the truly attuned, and linguistics is the scalpel to understanding what is being said.

Translation is as delicate a thing as interpretation... assuming the interpreter really knows the subject.

As for the 'changing times' and the epochs of our understanding I have to remain realistic about my understanding.

It sounds to me like Pope Francis' death is being projected as heralding change...  
(so nothing has changed really, there hasn't been a single papal death that wasn't called
a harbinger of doom.  It's natural social behavior when an icon dies.

The heavens are a template for many things... but not directions.
We are human... we can 'direct' ourselves...
(in fact, it's the seminal human experience)

I do believe that such things as portents and wisdom exists...
It's fascinating.

But Pope Francis was a man... as a symbol, he struggled.

... who wouldn't?
Reply
#30
(04-21-2025, 09:48 PM)Maxmars Wrote: The heavens are a template for many things... but not directions.
We are human... we can 'direct' ourselves...
(in fact, it's the seminal human experience)


What?  I think the sun and stars are pretty good for direction.

But I don't like to look directly at the moon 
Reply