Precognition: Remote Viewing

[UltraBudgie]

I find myself questioning the certainty that what is being observed is not something "shown to them" as opposed to something they see....

Silly distinction I know...

not silly; this is probably true in a much broader sense too

[Sirius]

I find myself questioning the certainty that what is being observed is not something "shown to them" as opposed to something they see....

Silly distinction I know...

Indeed...I never know without confirmation..but I also don't do remote viewing, I tried, everything is just woo weird and investigating brings regret

Found this a while a go and found it interesting

Be careful at this point not to let the Querant state his question to you. You should be able to state it to him, by reason of the position of the Significator. You may have to add some few words of explanation to those suggested above, but unless the Querant acknowledges that you have correctly determined the main substance of his question, abandon the attempt to divine for him, and do not resume it for at least two hours. Better still, wait until the next day. If you are unable to determine the nature of the question by the position of the Significator the divination is “not radical,” as astrologers say of those indications in a horary chart which indicate that no attempt should made to give advice or delineation. Never proceed with a divination unless you have been successful in this first operation.

Not questioning anyone, there is overlapping methods, that is all, and things that can't be tested are claimed by Cthulhu