New global monetary system

[quintessentone]

This does not look good.

"IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva recently warned that the global monetary system is unprepared for artificial intelligence-driven cyber threats, specifically citing risks from the new Anthropic "Mythos" model which can rapidly identify security vulnerabilities.  She emphasized that the world currently lacks the capacity to protect international finance from large-scale cyber risks and called for urgent global collaboration on regulatory guardrails. 

The international monetary landscape is also undergoing a gradual transition from a US-centric system to a multi-polar structure, driven by geopolitical shifts and declining trust in the US dollar.  Central banks are increasingly diversifying reserves into gold, with prices reaching unprecedented levels, as nations seek protection against sanctions and potential stagflation.  Despite these changes, the US dollar remains dominant, accounting for approximately half of all cross-border payments, with no credible alternative currency currently available to replace it. 

Looking ahead, the IMF has revised its global growth forecast to 3.1% for 2026, down from 3.4% in 2025, citing intensified geopolitical risks and trade uncertainties.  Meanwhile, policy debates continue regarding the role of dollar-backed stablecoins, with new US administrations promoting their development as a potential complement to traditional banking systems, though concerns remain about their impact on financial stability and sanctions enforcement." (LLM)

----

https://sana.sy/en/economic/2310087

---

Or, is there a conspiracy theory here, hmm?

[cherokeetroy]

The international monetary landscape is also undergoing a gradual transition from a US-centric system to a multi-polar structure, driven by geopolitical shifts and declining trust in the US dollar.  

I think this is going to be the biggest structural shift

The current global governing/banking system will be overshadowed by AI and crypto

There may be thousands of different digital currencies but they'll all primarily run on the same rails controlled and operated by big tech

[cherokeetroy]

https://x.com/jmontforttx/status/2053092...11372?s=20

[cherokeetroy]

https://x.com/mehori/status/2052631947101483045?s=20
https://x.com/artisbrutal2021/status/205...51155?s=20

[quintessentone]

I think this is going to be the biggest structural shift

The current global governing/banking system will be overshadowed by AI and crypto

There may be thousands of different digital currencies but they'll all primarily run on the same rails controlled and operated by big tech

How will big tech guarantee digital security? What I'm reading is that they can't, at this point in time.

[cherokeetroy]

How will big tech guarantee digital security? What I'm reading is that they can't, at this point in time.

They can't 

Organizations are moving towards post-quantum cryptography and they're hoping that will suffice
https://www.naorisprotocol.com/

But what do I know
All I do is spread misinformation 

It's very likely everything I've predicted about crypto is bullshit that I randomly pick out from my stupid ass algorithms 

So I wouldn't worry about it

[quintessentone]

They can't 

Organizations are moving towards post-quantum cryptography and they're hoping that will suffice
https://www.naorisprotocol.com/

But what do I know
All I do is spread misinformation 

It's very likely everything I've predicted about crypto is bullshit that I randomly pick out from my stupid ass algorithms 

So I wouldn't worry about it

Lack of trust is a given when there is no guarantee of account hacking security and that they don't seem to be offering insurance on one's crypto money(?), like the banks do.

---

"No, banks do not insure cryptocurrency accounts or the digital assets themselves. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) explicitly states that it does not insure assets issued by non-banking entities, such as cryptocurrency exchanges or digital coins, even if those assets are purchased or held through an FDIC-insured bank. 

While fiat currency (such as US dollars) held in an account on a crypto platform may be eligible for FDIC insurance up to $250,000 if those funds are held in partner banks, this protection ceases entirely the moment those dollars are converted into cryptocurrency.  Cryptocurrency is classified as an investment asset or commodity, similar to stocks or bonds, which are excluded from federal deposit insurance coverage. Consequently, if a cryptocurrency exchange fails, is hacked, or goes bankrupt, users do not have government-backed recourse to recover their digital assets." (LLM)

---

Red flags...red flags...IMO.

[cherokeetroy]

Lack of trust is a given when there is no guarantee of account hacking security and that they don't seem to be offering insurance on one's crypto money(?), like the banks do.

---

"No, banks do not insure cryptocurrency accounts or the digital assets themselves. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) explicitly states that it does not insure assets issued by non-banking entities, such as cryptocurrency exchanges or digital coins, even if those assets are purchased or held through an FDIC-insured bank. 

While fiat currency (such as US dollars) held in an account on a crypto platform may be eligible for FDIC insurance up to $250,000 if those funds are held in partner banks, this protection ceases entirely the moment those dollars are converted into cryptocurrency.  Cryptocurrency is classified as an investment asset or commodity, similar to stocks or bonds, which are excluded from federal deposit insurance coverage. Consequently, if a cryptocurrency exchange fails, is hacked, or goes bankrupt, users do not have government-backed recourse to recover their digital assets." (LLM)

---

Red flags...red flags...IMO.

Digital assets are an emergent technology so the regulatory framework is fluid 

The structure is being built piece by piece

atm, cryptocurrency is classified as property not currency, so the FDIC doesn't insure it 

But RWA (real world assets) are quickly being tokenized, transforming ownership into blockchain-based tokens

Cryptocurrency can be insured and certified as tokenized assets

[cherokeetroy]

https://x.com/berniemoreno/status/205384...92190?s=20

[cherokeetroy]

https://x.com/KuwlShow/status/2054077150685175969?s=20

"CLARITY FOR 100 YEARS

Why would President Trump - author of The Art of the Deal - bring this exact constellation of executives to meet with Xi Jinping at one of the most compressed geopolitical moments in modern history?

Not just politicians.
Not just diplomats.
But the CEOs representing:

• global banking
• global payments
• semiconductors
• AI infrastructure
• aerospace
• food supply
• tokenization
• communications networks
• custody
• biotech
• manufacturing
• capital markets

Because perhaps the real negotiation is larger than trade.

Perhaps the old architecture itself is under negotiation.

The post-1944 world was built on:

centralized debt, military enforcement, petrodollar dependency, SWIFT control, and industrial-age financial rails.

But a digital civilization requires something different:

• real-time settlement
• neutral interoperability
• decentralized verification
• tokenized value transfer
• sovereign cooperation without surrendering sovereignty
• transparent ledgers instead of opaque intermediaries
• economic incentives aligned toward stability instead of perpetual conflict

What if the real “deal” is not about China defeating America or America defeating China… …but preventing mutually assured financial destruction during the largest technological transition in human history?

Because AI + quantum + tokenization + autonomous finance cannot scale on 1970s settlement rails.

And if value itself becomes instant, global, programmable, and interoperable… then whoever helps architect the transition may shape the next 100 years.

Maybe this is why payments giants, asset managers, chip manufacturers, aerospace leaders, and tokenization infrastructure firms all suddenly matter in the same room.

Not because they represent separate industries.

But because they collectively represent the operating system of the emerging world economy.

A sovereignty-first system.

A multipolar system.

A digitally interconnected system.

Potentially even a peace-through-prosperity system.

Not a world without nations.

A world where nations can transact without financial hostage-taking.

Not centralization.

Interoperability.

Not conquest.

Coordination.

Not endless friction.

Atomic settlement.

And perhaps that is why the room matters more than the headlines.

Godspeed, Mr. President."