I think I'm fixin' to discuss M-theory and expansion theory a bit next so we can get that out of the way. It's not directly relevant, but since it was brought up. We may be held up in this preliminary thread for a while, but that's okay, it's all good and this is fun stuff.
The Andromeda Code : M-theory Vs Expansion Theory
So with the conventional expansion theory we basically have the three spatial dimensions plus time, and M-theory introduces these micro dimensions (calabi-yau maniflold) plus one spatially extended dimension referred as the bulk in which this theoretical multiverse resides.
Now first off I have problem with this "bulk" because I don't believe space to be infinite and eternal – I believe space was also created as a medium for the things to come.
I would actually put time as the primary and initial dimension of the creator where the spatial dimensions would be secondary to that.
I think also part of the problem is in trying to reconcile some of the more abstract dimensions via mathematics where numbers are not quite so relevant except for maybe zero and one.
Forcing mathematics where it does not belong may result in some catchy dimensional attributes – like trying to force all dimensions in a spacetime model via mathematics.
The problem could be that some dimensions of existence just simply do not relate to mathematics, and this is edging its way towards some dimensions of consciousness that are not mathematically rectifiable.
What is a dimension of existence? We are talking about root components of existence that exhibit depth and measurement. Consciousness is very dimensional with its various modes of 'feeling'(and depth/variance thereof), but there can be no declaration of this in a mathematical sense, and if you somehow manage to work it into some cosmological/dimensional formula you might end up with something like these micro dimensions which allow the math to work, but are actually placeholders for something else a bit more ethereal.
The Andromeda Code : M-theory Vs Expansion Theory
So with the conventional expansion theory we basically have the three spatial dimensions plus time, and M-theory introduces these micro dimensions (calabi-yau maniflold) plus one spatially extended dimension referred as the bulk in which this theoretical multiverse resides.
Now first off I have problem with this "bulk" because I don't believe space to be infinite and eternal – I believe space was also created as a medium for the things to come.
I would actually put time as the primary and initial dimension of the creator where the spatial dimensions would be secondary to that.
I think also part of the problem is in trying to reconcile some of the more abstract dimensions via mathematics where numbers are not quite so relevant except for maybe zero and one.
Forcing mathematics where it does not belong may result in some catchy dimensional attributes – like trying to force all dimensions in a spacetime model via mathematics.
The problem could be that some dimensions of existence just simply do not relate to mathematics, and this is edging its way towards some dimensions of consciousness that are not mathematically rectifiable.
What is a dimension of existence? We are talking about root components of existence that exhibit depth and measurement. Consciousness is very dimensional with its various modes of 'feeling'(and depth/variance thereof), but there can be no declaration of this in a mathematical sense, and if you somehow manage to work it into some cosmological/dimensional formula you might end up with something like these micro dimensions which allow the math to work, but are actually placeholders for something else a bit more ethereal.
