Narrative 101: Judge orders CDC and FDA webpages brought back up.

[Maxmars]

From ArsTechnica: Judge orders Trump admin. to restore CDC and FDA webpages by midnight


 (I place this here because if nothing else the CDC and FDA webpages being spoken of is media.)

A federal judge today, February 11, gave the Trump administration until 11:59 pm tonight to restore public documents and datasets that were abruptly removed or altered from federal health websites to comply with an executive order on gender ideology.

The narrative brought by this journalist was that the administration was "blocking" access to public data.

Hence the order.

Of course, you could just characterize and say that intent of the administration was to extract all the social-engineering and ideology inserted into the content by certain 'activist' entities.

Which would mean that the agencies would rather not comply, and hold the website hostage.

But that would be the other side of the same journalistic 'process.'

The webpages that were subsequently removed include key guidance and data on health risks in youth, school health policies, social vulnerability, environmental justice, HIV testing and prevention, assisted reproductive technologies, contraceptives, and recommendations for improving clinical studies, among other essential information.

They failed to remove the actual offending content, and instead removed the entire document?  What could be the reason for that?  Artistic integrity?  "Creative ownership?"

Now, having failed to strip the garbage out of government communications; they claim the 'hazard and crisis' of their failure is the administration's fault?  Weak sauce.

Just sayin'

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

Well I just can't stop ranting, so much for trying to ignore this administration. I tried to pre-edited this one though... So it might be more cohesive.

Answer:

Maybe they want unplanned teen pregnancies and STDs? Perhaps obliviousness to sex is good? I dont think it matters so long as there's no more gay kids, or god forbid transgender kids being "made" by this crap.

The motivation is because far too many kids are queer now. "Woke engineering" raised the numbers up to 25% of Gen Z kids identifying as something other than straight.

He wants to rid the government endorsement of doing this, and as a byproduct it's endorsement of LGB destigmatization to go after the T.

Maybe those Gen Z only numbers went up because it wasn't feared anymore? Even becoming popular and trendy? And maybe that was the downfall? The few years of engineering managed to undo the stigma a bit. Bring the numbers closer to what it was before the control mechanism of society changed to Christianity.

Honestly, our Greek and Roman ancestors wouldn't even understand the post-Constantine world of sex. They'd be like, "What, no public sex orgies for Dionysius? What has become of our tradition?

I relate this through my unique experience. Which I have no problem sharing, because it might not be so unique.

Back in the 90s, even without any woke engineering in place, it took all of one look at a Penthouse to know. But then the stigma of what that meant took over. So I hid my lady picture show in the back of the closet and largely rationalized it or repressed it away. Tried to be normal, and thought I was, even though my first serious relationship was with a girl for 11 months.

We thought we hid it well until Mommy Dearest read her diary. Then an angry righteous parent came storming to my front door to expose to my parents their evil daughter's corruption of theirs. I outed myself cry-screaming something like, "She came on to me, you psycho blanking blank. Maybe she inherited it from you?"

I liked that woke normalization was moving beyond those type of situations happening. Or her subsequent vacation to Idaho. Like a flippin movie. And that official government websites were being open about sex issues like, contraception, orientation, and gender identity. Didnt push too far for me.

Seemed like it could make for less angry kids hating themselves. Less kids committing suicide for being different, but those numbers ended up going the other way and trans issues crossed the line. So all LGBT destigmatization died with it. Even if the leading reason for teen suicide wasn't even identity related.

It may have been social engineering, but I liked what it was attempting to undo. Like the tendency to be weary of differences. The predisposition to exclude what isn't like the others. I feel it is almost like thousands of years of ingrained values and stigma attempting to be undone. It wasn't always so culturally repulsive. And it seems to follow religious views where it becomes abhorrent. The more religious the more abhorrent..

Sorry to continue on again, but this is one of the main things I was worried about. The crusade to fix the kids broken by Biden's woke policy. I just haven't felt the need to get too in depth until now.

[Sirius]

Well I just can't stop ranting, so much for trying to ignore this administration. I tried to pre-edited this one though... So it might be more cohesive.

Answer:

Maybe they want unplanned teen pregnancies and STDs? Perhaps obliviousness to sex is good? I dont think it matters so long as there's no more gay kids, or god forbid transgender kids being "made" by this crap.

The motivation is because far too many kids are queer now. "Woke engineering" raised the numbers up to 25% of Gen Z kids identifying as something other than straight.

He wants to rid the government endorsement of doing this, and as a byproduct it's endorsement of LGB destigmatization to go after the T.

Maybe those Gen Z only numbers went up because it wasn't feared anymore? Even becoming popular and trendy? And maybe that was the downfall? The few years of engineering managed to undo the stigma a bit. Bring the numbers closer to what it was before the control mechanism of society changed to Christianity.

Honestly, our Greek and Roman ancestors wouldn't even understand the post-Constantine world of sex. They'd be like, "What, no public sex orgies for Dionysius? What has become of our tradition?

I relate this through my unique experience. Which I have no problem sharing, because it might not be so unique.

Back in the 90s, even without any woke engineering in place, it took all of one look at a Penthouse to know. But then the stigma of what that meant took over. So I hid my lady picture show in the back of the closet and largely rationalized it or repressed it away. Tried to be normal, and thought I was, even though my first serious relationship was with a girl for 11 months.

We thought we hid it well until Mommy Dearest read her diary. Then an angry righteous parent came storming to my front door to expose to my parents their evil daughter's corruption of theirs. I outed myself cry-screaming something like, "She came on to me, you psycho blanking blank. Maybe she inherited it from you?"

I liked that woke normalization was moving beyond those type of situations happening. Or her subsequent vacation to Idaho. Like a flippin movie. And that official government websites were being open about sex issues like, contraception, orientation, and gender identity. Didnt push too far for me.

Seemed like it could make for less angry kids hating themselves. Less kids committing suicide for being different, but those numbers ended up going the other way and trans issues crossed the line. So all LGBT destigmatization died with it. Even if the leading reason for teen suicide wasn't even identity related.

It may have been social engineering, but I liked what it was attempting to undo. Like the tendency to be weary of differences. The predisposition to exclude what isn't like the others. I feel it is almost like thousands of years of ingrained values and stigma attempting to be undone. It wasn't always so culturally repulsive. And it seems to follow religious views where it becomes abhorrent. The more religious the more abhorrent..

Sorry to continue on again, but this is one of the main things I was worried about. The crusade to fix the kids broken by Biden's woke policy. I just haven't felt the need to get too in depth until now.

It never was about LGBT destigmatization, that was just a front for corruption and future solutions. Pretty sure there is some foreign involvement also.  What I'm looking at is a vulnerable group that was used and abused by just about everyone out there with an agenda. Same old shit, new day, or the same day. Hard to know when we are stuck in a time loop.

[sahgwa]

Well I just can't stop ranting, so much for trying to ignore this administration. I tried to pre-edited this one though... So it might be more cohesive.

Answer:

Maybe they want unplanned teen pregnancies and STDs? Perhaps obliviousness to sex is good? I dont think it matters so long as there's no more gay kids, or god forbid transgender kids being "made" by this crap.

The motivation is because far too many kids are queer now. "Woke engineering" raised the numbers up to 25% of Gen Z kids identifying as something other than straight.

He wants to rid the government endorsement of doing this, and as a byproduct it's endorsement of LGB destigmatization to go after the T.

Maybe those Gen Z only numbers went up because it wasn't feared anymore? Even becoming popular and trendy? And maybe that was the downfall? The few years of engineering managed to undo the stigma a bit. Bring the numbers closer to what it was before the control mechanism of society changed to Christianity.

Honestly, our Greek and Roman ancestors wouldn't even understand the post-Constantine world of sex. They'd be like, "What, no public sex orgies for Dionysius? What has become of our tradition?

I relate this through my unique experience. Which I have no problem sharing, because it might not be so unique.

Back in the 90s, even without any woke engineering in place, it took all of one look at a Penthouse to know. But then the stigma of what that meant took over. So I hid my lady picture show in the back of the closet and largely rationalized it or repressed it away. Tried to be normal, and thought I was, even though my first serious relationship was with a girl for 11 months.

We thought we hid it well until Mommy Dearest read her diary. Then an angry righteous parent came storming to my front door to expose to my parents their evil daughter's corruption of theirs. I outed myself cry-screaming something like, "She came on to me, you psycho blanking blank. Maybe she inherited it from you?"

I liked that woke normalization was moving beyond those type of situations happening. Or her subsequent vacation to Idaho. Like a flippin movie. And that official government websites were being open about sex issues like, contraception, orientation, and gender identity. Didnt push too far for me.

Seemed like it could make for less angry kids hating themselves. Less kids committing suicide for being different, but those numbers ended up going the other way and trans issues crossed the line. So all LGBT destigmatization died with it. Even if the leading reason for teen suicide wasn't even identity related.

It may have been social engineering, but I liked what it was attempting to undo. Like the tendency to be weary of differences. The predisposition to exclude what isn't like the others. I feel it is almost like thousands of years of ingrained values and stigma attempting to be undone. It wasn't always so culturally repulsive. And it seems to follow religious views where it becomes abhorrent. The more religious the more abhorrent..

Sorry to continue on again, but this is one of the main things I was worried about. The crusade to fix the kids broken by Biden's woke policy. I just haven't felt the need to get too in depth until now.

The average Joe has no problem with 'alternate sexualities' , they merely ask that something private like a sex life, be kept private. You are gay, good on you, it's not your whole raison d'etre and identity is it? 
They merely ask that men don't go into women's private areas and show their genitals around. 
I don't think that's too much to ask.
This whole 'Christian/patriarchal' demonisation of 'alternate sexualities' of course does exist, but like you alluded to yourself it was largely in the  past. This constant Progressive obsession with shoving private actions and identities into people's faces just angers people, and they would largely be an'ally' otherwise.  It stems from the Marxist/progressive trope that there is a 'struggle' and always an 'oppressor' If one does not really exist (anymore) then, by golly they will make a fuss and create one.  Boogey man boogey man. 
To pretend that there are not pushes to sexualise children by 'education' about gender swapping whilethey are not even sexual beings/they are prepubesecent is disingenuous.

[Maxmars]

The average Joe has no problem with 'alternate sexualities' , they merely ask that something private like a sex life, be kept private. You are gay, good on you, it's not your whole raison d'etre and identity is it? 
They merely ask that men don't go into women's private areas and show their genitals around. 
I don't think that's too much to ask.
This whole 'Christian/patriarchal' demonisation of 'alternate sexualities' of course does exist, but like you alluded to yourself it was largely in the  past. This constant Progressive obsession with shoving private actions and identities into people's faces just angers people, and they would largely be an'ally' otherwise.  It stems from the Marxist/progressive trope that there is a 'struggle' and always an 'oppressor' If one does not really exist (anymore) then, by golly they will make a fuss and create one.  Boogey man boogey man. 
To pretend that there are not pushes to sexualise children by 'education' about gender swapping whilethey are not even sexual beings/they are prepubesecent is disingenuous.

I think there was a general over-representation of "oppression" over recent activist and celebrity utterances, (amplified by a very hateful streak of the "press," I suppose.)

While there is no denying that as a people, communities of people often fixate (or can be led to fixate) on specific things which inevitably, once in hindsight, seem foolishly myopic and contrived... I will propose that most (if not all) of those instances in the past were the product of some form of "activism."