Revisiting Dr Day's NWO Predictions.

[quintessentone]

Yes mate so do I - it keeps getting deleted but here is a link to the full.text on Archive.com.

Dr Richard Day was 'National Medical Director' of Planned Parenthood and some of those predictions do line up closely with the pseudoscience of eugenics - Planned Parenthood was originally funded by eugenicist Clarence Gamble and founded by eugenicist Margaret Sanger.

The Rockefeller project 'Planned Parenthood' was fanatically interested in 'depopulation' and tactics to decrease population like 'promoting homosexuality' and 'putting sterilants in the water supply' are discussed in this 1969 document from the President of Planned Parenthood to the head of Rockefeller's population council (note that's the same year as the Day meeting).

It's also stated in the article below that Day worked at the 'Mount Sinai School of Medicine' which pops up a lot in eugenics research.




[Image: https://denyignorance.com//images/addsmilies/beer.gif]

I remember those long gone days where doctors acted as if they should be treated as Gods and the uneducated people treated them accordingly. My 91 year old mother still doesn't ask them questions about her health and I keep telling her that she is paying their salaries so she has a right to take up as much of their time as she deems necessary...I do. They even put a note on my medical file - 'Advocate for their own health' or something along those lines (so expect questions and long discussions).

Doctors were part of the elite back then and held contempt for those these deemed below them. Disgusting behaviour then and now. So it stands to reason with that mentality and no forethought for many future outcomes that they would first want to rid themselves of the contemptible peons. I don't see any benefit to humanity in their desires but see any ramblings from the elitists as to manipulate whatever they think they want for their own benefit.

(LLM)

"Context and Skepticism:
 While the predictions are frequently cited as eerily accurate—especially regarding the pandemic, surveillance, economic inequality, and cultural shifts—no verified public record of Dr. Day’s 1969 speech exists, and no independent documentation confirms the meeting or the quotes.  The primary source is Dr. Dunegan’s 1988 tape, which has not been independently verified. Dr. Day was a real person—a prominent physician and medical director of Planned Parenthood (1965–1968)—but the full extent of his alleged predictions remains unproven. 
Conclusion:Dr. Richard Day’s 1969 predictions are widely interpreted as a blueprint for a globalist agenda, with many linking them to modern events like the pandemic, economic control, and social upheaval.  However, the authenticity of the speech and the accuracy of the quotes remain unverified, and the claims are considered conspiracy theories by mainstream historians and researchers. "

[ANNEE]

I am not hung up on eugenics. 

It limits perspective. 

The bigger picture is — money - power - control. 

There has been a systematic plan in progress for decades (at least) — under various names. 

Who knows — maybe off-planet beings are requesting we get better control of our planet.

[SomeStupidName]

There really isn't a whole lot available publicly about these 2 doctors or the "The New Order of Barbarians". Eyes wide shut pops into mind I wonder if Stanley Kubrick used this story as inspiration. 

At this point I don't buy it. With other secret societies we have a little bit of providence to go off of that is at least something that can be pointed at that tangibly exists, this right now lacks that. I have found one book of claims and a couple obituaries.

I would think if Day wanted to be a barbarian wannabe he would be doing what he could to help them, not tell a group a people that might try to derail the order. What would he gain from this action because if it got out as it did he then would have been the target and it doesn't take a PhD to recognize that.

[Karl12]

(LLM)

"Context and Skepticism:
 While the predictions are frequently cited as eerily accurate—especially regarding the pandemic, surveillance, economic inequality, and cultural shifts—no verified public record of Dr. Day’s 1969 speech exists, and no independent documentation confirms the meeting or the quotes.  The primary source is Dr. Dunegan’s 1988 tape, which has not been independently verified. Dr. Day was a real person—a prominent physician and medical director of Planned Parenthood (1965–1968)—but the full extent of his alleged predictions remains unproven. 

Conclusion:Dr. Richard Day’s 1969 predictions are widely interpreted as a blueprint for a globalist agenda, with many linking them to modern events like the pandemic, economic control, and social upheaval.  However, the authenticity of the speech and the accuracy of the quotes remain unverified, and the claims are considered conspiracy theories by mainstream historians and researchers. "

Would appreciate it if you just posted your own thoughts on the thread subject mate.. instead of just cut and pasting 'AI slop'.

Have seen you flood and dilute threads with it before and it's not pretty - especially considering this is a discussion forum.

Last time I looked LML's were spouting Bayer propaganda telling me that glysophate was safe so forgive me if I don't trust the agendas of those who create AI 'guardrails'.

The negative framing of its answer is quite revealing (as is your use of emotive words like 'fantasizing' and 'rambling') - don't know if you actually bothered to watch the OP video because you seem reluctant to discuss it but he clearly states that recording devices and note taking were forbidden in the room.

Also got to love the way you highlighted 'conspiracy theories' - have you seen what forum you're actually on lol?

Who knows maybe Dr Lawrence Dunegan did make it all up - if so it's one of the most predictive works of science fiction of the last century - also funny that the two organisations behind the meeting have severe eugenic back histories and were discussing similar things in their internal communiqués (in fact the Rockefeller Foundation are on record doing a hell of a lot worse).

[quintessentone]

Would appreciate it if you just posted your own thoughts on the thread subject mate.. instead of just cut and pasting 'AI slop'.

Have seen you flood and dilute threads with it before and it's not pretty - especially considering this is a discussion forum.

Last time I looked LML's were spouting Bayer propaganda telling me that glysophate was safe so forgive me if I don't trust the agendas of those who create AI 'guardrails'.

The negative framing of its answer is quite revealing (as is your use of emotive words like 'fantasizing' and 'rambling') - don't know if you actually bothered to watch the OP video because you seem reluctant to discuss it but he clearly states that recording devices and note taking were forbidden in the room.

Also got to love the way you highlighted 'conspiracy theories' - have you seen what forum you're actually on lol?

Who knows maybe Dr Lawrence Dunegan did make it all up - if so it's one of the most predictive works of science fiction of the last century - also funny that the two organisations behind the meeting have severe eugenic back histories and were discussing similar things in their internal communiqués (in fact the Rockefeller Foundation are on record doing a hell of a lot worse).

I first prefer to determine whether something is truth/fact or not, unlike you apparently. So of course it takes me longer to reach my own thoughts/conclusions because 'research'.

Forgive my colourful wording using 'fantasizing' and 'rambling' but those are credible words used in psychology and any emotive interpretation is strictly coming from your head.

The conspiracy theory side of this was never offered in your opening post, rather the opposite.

The point here is that your vid was Dunegan's interpretation of Day's 1969 speech, so second-hand and most likely tainted interpretation, so since the waters were already muddied, I had no choice but to investigate further to come to a conclusion about this topic. I do the same with the UFO/UAP threads in so much as almost everything is not firsthand experience/witness accounts.