DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

My Voice, My Word Choice
#1
I am a reader and a writer. The pen is mightier than the sword.

If you’ve ever taken a composition or creative writing class you know about things like tone, voice, rhetoric.

Comedians can tell the same joke in different ways and with different results. Sometimes a pause or exaggeration of a single word can make or break how it lands.

This is why the grammar nazis, the prose police, and the typo gestapo annoy me. I admit I will point out someone’s mistake to clarify meaning or intent, but rarely to belittle them or ignore their message. Sometimes the mistake or misspelling is there for a reason.

We are living in an interesting time. Digital communication is fascinating to me. We’re no longer just scribbling dirty things in the porta johns. We are nonstop on social media recording our written and spoken words more than ever before. We broadcast our thoughts to the whole world at a rapid pace and the internet is forever. This also means that everything is now a public forum where we interject our emotions and politics into it due to the comfort and convenience of the tech. We need our dopamine damnit! 

We are doing less outlining and editing of our thoughts, and doing more reactive and impulsive thinking instead.

And this is precisely why we need to stop being offended by words and telling others what to use and how to use them.

In HS I wrote a poem using the word hobo. Teacher said everything is on point but she doesn’t know about the word hobo--reconsider it. I was a little shocked and confused because it almost had nothing else to do with the poem and was used a single time. Then I was lectured on word choice and that words can be offensive and consider the audience blah blah blah. She looked physically wounded the whole time.

I kept the word in my poem for my final draft. Nothing else worked in my creative opinion. (Anecdote: that poem did go on to be published as a First Place winner in a literary magazine woot!)

But the whole experience stuck with me. I figured a teacher in a writing class of all people would understand the importance of freedom of expression. It also inadvertently taught me the power a single word can have. I decided to expand my vocabulary.

Recently I was told not to use the word illegal when talking about immigration. Okay so you’re just trying to edit my writing or speech at this point just like my high school teacher. We also can’t use the term homeless. It’s unhoused now. Utter bullshit!

You’re not reminding me to check my social sensitivity when you compare these two words homeless and unhoused. Look at them at face value. Is one really more offensive than the other? They’re the same damn meaning with a different prefix or suffix. Utter. Bullshit.

You’re trying to control how I think at this point. You’re trying to send in a Trojan horse of thought manipulation. You're testing your mental dominance over me.

I would like what you’re saying more if you said it more aligned with my feelings and leanings.

Well, Teacher, I don’t need your dark sarcasm I don’t need your thought control!

This goes against everything to do with free speech and creative expression.

Let’s circle back. Yes words can be offensive and hurt. I’ll be the first to admit I can be overly sensitive to an abrasive joke or rude remark.

But it’s not me who should be telling others what not to say and how to say it. It’s my responsibility to cry it out and then come back with thicker skin next time.

It’s your responsibility too.

People are going to say some really F’ed up S. That’s unavoidable. We hear it and read it all the time things like “Death to the Jews” or “Turn the Middle East into glass.”

Words can hurt. They really do. But instead of censoring it or being afraid of the person behind them we have to meet them on the court with our own best game.

Now when you overuse things like fascist or Hitler or woke libtard their pull of gravity eventually weakens. We start to use these words automatically, as emotional reflexes. When we do this we start sapping the creative and effective potency of our writing and speech.

You may have noticed my moniker here on DI. One of my biggest hobbies is listening to prank call shows. Very hurtful stuff. But there’s rules. Only 1-2 calls to the same person because then it loses impact and becomes harassment. Don’t do anything that is going to get someone injured or cause emotional distress (e.g. you don’t call someone up and tell them their family is dead.)

So while I encourage everyone to use their words and styles and flavors to deliver their message, I would also encourage you to be aware that your words can become a cudgel instead of a message. This is also when we stop really listening to each other because we’ve heard it before and found the attack to be weak. Or we become bullied. I don’t want this.

We have to keep talking without the instinct to censor or plug our ears. Or then we’re left with only 2 options: distance or collision. We separate or really do come to blows.

I don’t want this. Keep talking. This is the only way to understanding each other. We are more alike than unalike. Let’s start acting like it.
#2

#3
Well, IMO, using certain words or phrases does reveal the author's true leanings in some respects, and the T&C rules here do caution against political baiting, which can very easily be revealed simply using a well-chosen word or phrase.
"The only journey is the one within."
#4
T&C also discourage those cutesy politician name modifications, which is nice.

It is very easy to pick up language and phrasing in online discourse and then bring it to real life. It can highlight how charged it is, which isn't obvious from within the echo-chamber.

Say someone sounds like Hitler at a local pub and you might get a fist to the nose!

It's good to get those reality checks sometimes.

It is also human or social nature to 'code-match'. To attempt to demonstrate 'in-group' membership by language.

For example, I am tempted to say "anodyne language is retarded".
#5
There's different T&C's on other sites and even fewer in the real world. I am not encouraging anybody to break T&C's here.
#6
This makes me think of the "flip-side" of what someone on another thread was saying. Hear me out.

It was put forth that to understand the art an artist creates, one must look at the life of the artist themselves. Their lived experience, the culture they come from, the worldly issues of importance to them, their view on various issues that may be found in the work, etc. Okay, that's scholarship.

But I was wondering if that's true. It seemed to me that the "art" that an artist tries to convey is exactly something that transcends that cultural matrix from which it arises. It speaks to something universal in human nature. More persistent. The 'cultural context' is something that the artist often tries to get out of the way of. It's not the firmament of the work, it's the scaffolding. If it requires cultural and specific context to speak to one, as only art can, then it's more hackery than art, perhaps.

So the flip side, in this case, considering "prose" or how we express ourselves verbally.

Does the artist try to "get in the head" of the audience? Consider every instance of how particular people with particular viewpoints might perceive their work? Select each word and idea carefully, with what they know of their audience, how they want it to impact them, how it might be seen in the future?

Maybe somewhat. Maybe that "informs" their creative expressive process. But, also, maybe, it something that one has to "get out of the way of" when creating. Throw to the wind. Say "fuck it, if they don't understand, I don't care". If there's true art in the expression, it will shine through regardless, if it wants to.
#7
Interesting. The thought never even occurred to me about T&C's though.

I guess I was just trying to encourage more effective communication, and that's what T&C's are for in principle.

Maybe I'll stick to my day job  Duh
#8
(08-15-2025, 10:48 AM)AlroyFarms Wrote: Interesting. The thought never even occurred to me about T&C's though.

I guess I was just trying to encourage more effective communication, and that's what T&C's are for in principle.

Maybe I'll stick to my day job  Duh

As with 'getting it out there' with art or writing, it really comes down to the intention, who is the audience, and what does the artist/writer want to evoke within themselves or from others.

Creativity can be very emotional, so it is very easy to forget oneself and go all out with symbolism and/or those words/phrases that may incite oneself or others to 'lose it' (lose the initial intention), so to speak.
"The only journey is the one within."
#9
One thing this teacher done was bring out your character and showed what you really stand for, which paid off. Just keep being true to yourself, while not always easy, seams like something in the universe does like it.
#10
(08-15-2025, 09:53 AM)AlroyFarms Wrote: You’re not reminding me to check my social sensitivity when you compare these two words homeless and unhoused. Look at them at face value. Is one really more offensive than the other? They’re the same damn meaning with a different prefix or suffix. Utter. Bullshit.

To me they look like they could be interpreted in different ways, with "homeless" being someone without a home while "unhoused" sounds more like someone that has a house but is not there.
Besides the difference between "home" and "house", as one can live in a house that is not a home.