Is the "New World Order" racist?

[Byrd]

I was having a conversation the other day about racism, and what the line is between racist and supremacist ideologies. For example, is the proliferation of the practice of abortion in America, which disproportionately affects the Black population and communities, a form of racism, class warfare, or eugenics? Please ignore this example if you believe that the widespread availability of pregnancy termination is merely a startling victory for human rights.

I had a point to make that I wasn't sure of, and wanted to get the opinion of you well-reasoned folks here. I assert that the "New World Order" is in fact non-racist, while still being a completely supremacist elite ideology: based on the principle that they are more qualified and entitled to rule than the non-elite masses. We can perhaps point to this supremacist ideology originating in the modern world in British Colonialism and Empire, with its profoundly racist extractionist practices and concept of manifest destiny. This allied in the 19th century with American Exceptionalism and its hemispheric dominance of native and non-white populations, and allied in the 20th century with Europe cultural strongholds and the Zionist doctrine of a nationalist manifestation of "chosen people". This "New World Order" aggregate has somehow maintained its heterogeneous supremacist and racist nature in the current day, bound together by institutions such as the World Economic Forum, its differences transcended by the common belief: we deserve to own and control everything, because we are better than you.

So, while still being profoundly racist in specific expression of classism and supremacist ideologies, the modern world globalist system is non-racist in that it doesn't really care, in aggregate, what form that racism and cultural dominance takes. This allows it to use racism as a weapon of control against the proletariat who are mired in lower-class racism, anyone who does not acknowledge that the god money trumps such minor hatefulness.

Look at the Ivy League in the Americas, who are quite willing to accept people of all skin tones, as long as they act in accord with their values, or present an opposition safely positioned within their sphere. Or the alliance of UKUSA and Israel, or Christian and Jew, who don't care how each other present their dominance of the middle east and muslim populations, as long as their economic and territorial goals are in accord.

What are your thoughts? Are you racist?

Depend on what you mean by "New World Order"... if you're talking political, then it's been redefined three times and refers to international balance of power
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_...(politics)

The conspiracy theory about a "New World Order" actually dates back more than a hundred years and has its roots in anti-Semiticism (good paper on it here: https://www.middlebury.edu/institute/aca...-dangerous) -- and in the US, popularized by the John Birch Society in the 1950's where it was used against Communism.

The 1990's saw it fused with End Times Christianity (I was on the old Rapture Ready Board and lemme tell ya, it was VERY popular) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_...acy_theory

And it's changed again with Black Lives Matter and other movements.  The Wikipedia article is really very good, and many of our early/earliest ATS members will get a kick out of revisiting the changes (I'm one of the original ATS members...if you list the members by join date, I'm somewhere in the top 30.)


So... it's kind of "Whatever you can shoehorn in here as the latest Scary Thing ™"

Also, the idea that abortion is practiced mainly by Blacks (and is thus genocide) is not correct.  There's a 3 percent (roughly) difference in the number of Black women seeking abortions vs White women.  Hispanics are third but at roughly three percent below white women:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/6565...cContainer

All of those numbers would go down quickly if men decided to universally wear condoms unless they and the woman agreed that they wanted a child.