10-28-2024, 03:36 PM
I was having a conversation the other day about racism, and what the line is between racist and supremacist ideologies. For example, is the proliferation of the practice of abortion in America, which disproportionately affects the Black population and communities, a form of racism, class warfare, or eugenics? Please ignore this example if you believe that the widespread availability of pregnancy termination is merely a startling victory for human rights.
I had a point to make that I wasn't sure of, and wanted to get the opinion of you well-reasoned folks here. I assert that the "New World Order" is in fact non-racist, while still being a completely supremacist elite ideology: based on the principle that they are more qualified and entitled to rule than the non-elite masses. We can perhaps point to this supremacist ideology originating in the modern world in British Colonialism and Empire, with its profoundly racist extractionist practices and concept of manifest destiny. This allied in the 19th century with American Exceptionalism and its hemispheric dominance of native and non-white populations, and allied in the 20th century with Europe cultural strongholds and the Zionist doctrine of a nationalist manifestation of "chosen people". This "New World Order" aggregate has somehow maintained its heterogeneous supremacist and racist nature in the current day, bound together by institutions such as the World Economic Forum, its differences transcended by the common belief: we deserve to own and control everything, because we are better than you.
So, while still being profoundly racist in specific expression of classism and supremacist ideologies, the modern world globalist system is non-racist in that it doesn't really care, in aggregate, what form that racism and cultural dominance takes. This allows it to use racism as a weapon of control against the proletariat who are mired in lower-class racism, anyone who does not acknowledge that the god money trumps such minor hatefulness.
Look at the Ivy League in the Americas, who are quite willing to accept people of all skin tones, as long as they act in accord with their values, or present an opposition safely positioned within their sphere. Or the alliance of UKUSA and Israel, or Christian and Jew, who don't care how each other present their dominance of the middle east and muslim populations, as long as their economic and territorial goals are in accord.
What are your thoughts? Are you racist?
I had a point to make that I wasn't sure of, and wanted to get the opinion of you well-reasoned folks here. I assert that the "New World Order" is in fact non-racist, while still being a completely supremacist elite ideology: based on the principle that they are more qualified and entitled to rule than the non-elite masses. We can perhaps point to this supremacist ideology originating in the modern world in British Colonialism and Empire, with its profoundly racist extractionist practices and concept of manifest destiny. This allied in the 19th century with American Exceptionalism and its hemispheric dominance of native and non-white populations, and allied in the 20th century with Europe cultural strongholds and the Zionist doctrine of a nationalist manifestation of "chosen people". This "New World Order" aggregate has somehow maintained its heterogeneous supremacist and racist nature in the current day, bound together by institutions such as the World Economic Forum, its differences transcended by the common belief: we deserve to own and control everything, because we are better than you.
So, while still being profoundly racist in specific expression of classism and supremacist ideologies, the modern world globalist system is non-racist in that it doesn't really care, in aggregate, what form that racism and cultural dominance takes. This allows it to use racism as a weapon of control against the proletariat who are mired in lower-class racism, anyone who does not acknowledge that the god money trumps such minor hatefulness.
Look at the Ivy League in the Americas, who are quite willing to accept people of all skin tones, as long as they act in accord with their values, or present an opposition safely positioned within their sphere. Or the alliance of UKUSA and Israel, or Christian and Jew, who don't care how each other present their dominance of the middle east and muslim populations, as long as their economic and territorial goals are in accord.
What are your thoughts? Are you racist?
