How the corruption of science has impacted public perception.

[LightAngel]

If Ron Johnson was president then our world would be a better place because he is fighting for the truth and he has a good heart!



Please listen to this when you have time and then investigate and make up your own mind.

[MichSwampbuck]

Senate Homeland Security Committee Examines Science, Vaccines, and Public Perception

That video is over three hours apparently, but at the beginning they stated that in 2016, it was found that 70% of peer-reviewed scientific studies could not be reproduced by other scientists. Due to corruption in science and influence from big pharma, as much of 70% of peer review studies and findings are not reproducible, meaning nothing was scientifically proven in these experiments and studies. Basically they lied for money and people believed them because of "the science". This is in relation to vaccines, imagine how much of "the science" in other areas has been corrupted to this extent for money.

[Kwaka]

Dr Jake Scott had a tough job. Reminds me of some of the early debates around covid. Sounds like he is one getting called out for the Nuremberg trials with some of his remarks and responsibilities. He started great with records of millions supporting the scientific consensus as vaccinations good. Got hit bad when it comes to looking at the details.

Was some of that data really new for him to make it to that event? Not even knowing these vaccinations do move around the body for a doctor? It was good to see someone try to debate for the scientific consensus.

For the bit at the end around Robert Malone, tough job. Any evidence that the shooter at the CDC was inspired by the meme on Robert's post? Sounds like the shooter already had enough problems in his life.

[Chiefsmom]

Just got through it.   
Well, the memes?  I don't see how they were "invoking violence" or promoting gun use.  But I guess if you were already deranged, a picture of a gun might give you ideas.

It was a very interesting and informative debate.  I do have some issues with Dr. Scott.
He is either covering his rear end pretty well, or more nieve than I would want my doctor.
I hope that he really can be open minded and change his views.


Thanks for sharing that!

[LightAngel]

Just got through it.   
Well, the memes?  I don't see how they were "invoking violence" or promoting gun use.  But I guess if you were already deranged, a picture of a gun might give you ideas.

It was a very interesting and informative debate.  I do have some issues with Dr. Scott.
He is either covering his rear end pretty well, or more nieve than I would want my doctor.
I hope that he really can be open minded and change his views.


Thanks for sharing that!

You are welcome.

Some people can get very hostile when you post something like this, but this forum is very civil.

[chr0naut]

If Ron Johnson was president then our world would be a better place because he is fighting for the truth and he has a good heart!

Please listen to this when you have time and then investigate and make up your own mind.

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RofqrkIPHI]

Hmm.

Tens of thousands of authors and academics behind the current scientific side of the argument.

A few online naysayers, most who also lump together numerous other, often easily debunked, conspiracy theories.

Sorry but I will go with the majority as being far more credible.

[Gotalight]

Hmm.

Tens of thousands of authors and academics behind the current scientific side of the argument.

A few online naysayers, most who also lump together numerous other, often easily debunked, conspiracy theories.

Sorry but I will go with the majority as being far more credible.

Do you mean the same authors and academics who work for the pharma companies who advertise on network television whos bottom line depend upon your repeated purchase? 

Those credible majority.....?

[chr0naut]

Do you mean the same authors and academics who work for the pharma companies who advertise on network television whos bottom line depend upon your repeated purchase? 

Those credible majority.....?

There are tens of thousands more of them who don't, and will never, work for big pharma.

So, yes.

[RickyD]

That video is over three hours apparently, but at the beginning they stated that in 2016, it was found that 70% of peer-reviewed scientific studies could not be reproduced by other scientists. Due to corruption in science and influence from big pharma, as much of 70% of peer review studies and findings are not reproducible, meaning nothing was scientifically proven in these experiments and studies. Basically they lied for money and people believed them because of "the science". This is in relation to vaccines, imagine how much of "the science" in other areas has been corrupted to this extent for money.

Indeed did not need to watch this particular video to learn that science is bought and paid for. Sad but true...however because science is well a thing even a layman can do...people still do actual science. Look at starship...fucking science...and replaceable at that. Just don't blindly believe in things...and maybe...I know...read sources and scholarly papers for real sources. Also DARPA is 50 years ahead of the most cutting edge stuff you see...lol!

[chivo]

There are tens of thousands more of them who don't, and will never, work for big pharma.

So, yes.

What is it chronaut, no wall of text with super excellent edited links to the credible sources of information?

I take this as and admission, as in: chronaut has no argument whatsoever as to why big pharma and "peer reviewed research" are NOT corrupted and cheated.

Running out of gas mate?