Login

**Maxmars**

(04-16-2024, 03:16 PM)Notran Wrote: Everyone who has graduated with a degree in science and engineering will find it difficult to believe Bob Lazar is a physicist.

It's obvious he isn't a physicist.

Do you have any evidence he has the degrees he claimed he had? But I don't think you need to go that deep. His interviews point out to the lack of academic credentials.

Not saying he isn't intelligent or someone who isn't capable of working as a technician or an engineer.

And thanks for your lengthy work and for bringing to the attention of the public stories and topics that not many were willing to discuss or even mention a few decades ago.

I hate to appear as an advocate for Mr. Lazar. However, it is never always wise to assume that a lack of credentialed education is a cause to reject evidence. I have no doubt that Mr. Lazar has knowledge. And that has always been the justification for entertaining his utterances.

Whether the technical jargon he speaks may or may not be correct, the questions they engender are logical. If we are to ask questions of this nature it should be to Mr. Lazar (hint hint.) I don't know if such a thing is even possible given my general ignorance of Mr. Lazar's interest in "public" activities (if there even are any.)

I would be interested to learn how Mr. Knapp chooses his subject topics. He obviously recognizes that the entire area of research that involves unknown and unexplained phenomena like UFO's is woefully underserved...except in an entertainment sense (thank you Hollywood and 'monetization.')

Unlike many other journalists he seems to have been unafraid of the name-calling and derision which accompanies the subject. So why not ghosts, curses, legends semi-proven, etc. Why UFOs so much? In what way can it be important to Mr. Knapp, beyond "notoriety and public acclaim," which I'm willing to accept is not the reason in and of itself. What gave him the professional courage to proceed in this area?

But please don't let these questions displace any other members' which are likely to be more direct and relevant.