Ooh, here's another late entry...
From NewScientist: Shock discovery reveals deep sea nodules are a source of oxygen
You see, they discovered an unusually high amount of free oxygen at depths that didn't support photosynthesis, and discovered that it was due to a chemical process in what looked like balled-up clumps of rock littering the bottom. The chemical components of this rock, coupled with the pressures and seawater chemistry led to a sort of oxygen-production field down there...
So let's mine them.
Thanks for those links...
Currently, our situation seems to be that if the popular media doesn't "appear" to remember... then most people don't think it matters.
But I would submit that there is a big difference between repeating the past out of ignorance, and not even realizing you're repeating it.
From NewScientist: Shock discovery reveals deep sea nodules are a source of oxygen
You see, they discovered an unusually high amount of free oxygen at depths that didn't support photosynthesis, and discovered that it was due to a chemical process in what looked like balled-up clumps of rock littering the bottom. The chemical components of this rock, coupled with the pressures and seawater chemistry led to a sort of oxygen-production field down there...
So let's mine them.
(08-01-2024, 06:02 PM)Karl12 Wrote: 1930's
https://youtu.be/olJv2syNw9A?si=WPAU_ZzQoGVglc4G
https://youtu.be/SG_hokz-qGM?si=yoP-X6xB-CS0TmfI
God forbid anyone actually examine the subject.
Thanks for those links...
Currently, our situation seems to be that if the popular media doesn't "appear" to remember... then most people don't think it matters.
But I would submit that there is a big difference between repeating the past out of ignorance, and not even realizing you're repeating it.
