DI Wiki Epstein Archive ATS Archive PDF Archive North Korean TV
 

From 0 to 1 : the transitory aspect of reality
#11
(07-06-2025, 07:41 AM)IgnorantGod Wrote: As for 0 and 1, I'm not sure. It seems there need a something to assume a 1, in order to have 1, no matter if 1 is attainable or not. Something must declares 1 and make it 'pop out' of the infinity pool.

A 1 is imagined by a 0 which is an Orbit of infinite possibilities, remaining in it's orbit of 0 until it heads off on it's way towards being a "something".

Wisdom knocks quietly, always listen carefully.... and be a River flowing calmly.
#12
(07-06-2025, 04:36 PM)Nerb Wrote: A 1 is imagined by a 0 which is an Orbit of infinite possibilities, remaining in it's orbit of 0 until it heads off on it's way towards being a "something".

I was trying to make some kind of trinity out of the OP earlier, and that thought made me chuckle : 0 is preached by rationalist, 1 is preached by materialist and infinity is preached by priest, so that 0=mind, 1=matter and infinity='God' and everyone wants their part to be the 'Chosen One'.

As for this thread, I'd personally go with 0=past state, 1=next state and infinity=transition between 0 and 1. Though your comment above elegantly sums up the mathematical part of it.
As far as the apple tree is concerned, there's probably not much difference between a worm and a human...
Et le ver en dit : - Il y a toujours un pépin dans la pomme...
#13
(07-06-2025, 06:32 PM)IgnorantGod Wrote: I was trying to make some kind of trinity out of the OP earlier, and that thought made me chuckle : 0 is preached by rationalist, 1 is preached by materialist and infinity is preached by priest, so that 0=mind, 1=matter and infinity='God' and everyone wants their part to be the 'Chosen One'.

As for this thread, I'd personally go with 0=past state, 1=next state and infinity=transition between 0 and 1. Though your comment above elegantly sums up the mathematical part of it.

This kinda fits with an equation I came up with a while ago: L = m+p/t.

"Life is Momentum and Potential over Time".

Perhaps 0 is the orbit's Momentum, like an Electron spinning around a Nucleus and 1 is the Potential of how far the energy of that motion could project it at any given Time.

THE TRINITY.

This cycle could repeat with subtle but definative interations, 0 1 2 3 4 5 etc, but the original orbit (0) is no longer part of the equation. Fractal.

This could maybe get scaled up to the Macrocosmic scale or down to the Microcosmic scale and still apply.

Everything is Energy. We are tiny Sparks in a grand firework display, and the raging Inferno of a million Suns.

Wisdom knocks quietly, always listen carefully.... and be a River flowing calmly.
#14
(07-06-2025, 07:18 PM)Nerb Wrote: This kinda fits with an equation I came up with a while ago: L = m+p/t.

"Life is Momentum and Potential over Time".

Perhaps 0 is the orbit's Momentum, like an Electron spinning around a Nucleus and 1 is the Potential of how far the energy of that motion could project it at any given Time.

THE TRINITY.

This cycle could repeat with subtle but definative interations, 0 1 2 3 4 5 etc, but the original orbit (0) is no longer part of the equation. Fractal.

This could maybe get scaled up to the Macrocosmic scale or down to the Microcosmic scale and still apply.

Everything is Energy. We are tiny Sparks in a grand firework display, and the raging Inferno of a million Suns.

Quite the interesting approach! That equation is accurate me think.

However, I'm frankly conflicted with 0. For a few years, I did equate 0 to infinity, now, hmm not sure. There seems to be a different dynamic between 0 to n, and to m. 0=mind or 0='unexpression' seems rather apt.

As for motion, I think it boils done to a point moving around a circle, a wave. Radius of the circle and velocity of the point make the differences. Additionally, for specific sets of radius/velocity, you get the same wave lenght, so that the result is the same, despite the different circle and point's speed.

And finally, yes, fractal. Always fascinating, after reading Eric Ouellet's book "Illuminations : The UFO Experience as a Parapsychological event", whereas he introduce Rupert Sheldrake's morphic resonance, I started to ponder about the idea that planets could have some kind of similar field as the morphogenetic field, of which could communicate with 'lower' fields (fractal parts) through morphic resonance. I haven't delve on it further though.

We might as well be both a quantum blip from some and a universe for others.
As far as the apple tree is concerned, there's probably not much difference between a worm and a human...
Et le ver en dit : - Il y a toujours un pépin dans la pomme...
#15
[Image: 0VAZqH3.gif]


#16
(07-09-2025, 01:35 PM)Sirius Wrote: [Image: https://i.imgur.com/0VAZqH3.gif]

aargh make it stop

[Image: Dali_Crucifixion_hypercube.jpg]
#17
(07-09-2025, 01:48 PM)UltraBudgie Wrote: aargh make it stop


0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1
0 1 0 1 0
#18
Wait to do this, but you have to stand up. Look straight and stretch your arms out without looking. Still looking straight ahead push your arms back as far they can go. Then just look with your eyes either side and you will see that you can push that arm back further.
#19
(07-09-2025, 01:35 PM)Sirius Wrote: [Image: https://i.imgur.com/0VAZqH3.gif]

[...]

Higher dimension forms are fascinating. Tho it's hard to visualize since human's perception is only 2d images of 3d 'objects'. Time in this regard, is simply the sequence in which these images are 'shown' to consciousness.

And then, when all is said, one stumbles upon Godel's incompleteness theorem...
As far as the apple tree is concerned, there's probably not much difference between a worm and a human...
Et le ver en dit : - Il y a toujours un pépin dans la pomme...
#20
(07-09-2025, 02:24 PM)IgnorantGod Wrote: Higher dimension forms are fascinating. Tho it's hard to visualize since human's perception is only 2d images of 3d 'objects'. Time in this regard, is simply the sequence in which these images are 'shown' to consciousness.

And then, when all is said, one stumbles upon Godel's incompleteness theorem...

perception is....yours. arm exercise. if you want liminality you need to go to other dimensions, pretty much "up". Easy way to visualize 4D is hyperspheres and knowing quaternions teaches you to rotate 3D objects

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternion



Look up at the night sky filled with stars, stretch yours arms out until the edges of perception and wrap everything into the Goddess standing in the next dimension right in front of you