Hynek and Vallee

[DanZarfati]

Hi guys this text is 100 pages long. It is part of a book. You can read it. It is a detailed evolution of their relationship with the UFO field. Through careful observation of most of their texts, I extracted the quotations, where their wild shifts and twists are more evident and proeminent. The whole issue is, are such incoherent changes independent, the natural progression of their thoughts and conclusions, or was there externa pressure?

The text is just too big. so I will just leave the link. Please engage in discussion if you end up reading the text. 
It took me 6 months to craft. I took inspiration in this forum, it was a kind of response, because I was mostly disagreeing with what ppl was putting forward, I do believe my model is more "complete", or more "nuanced". 
Eager for your thoughts. 

https://www.mediafire.com/file/zax7ah0ea...k.pdf/file

edited for typo.

[UltraBudgie]

The UFOs themselves exhibited behavior consistent with patterns seen in other cases: they were
cooperative when Walters used his regular Polaroid camera but became less forthcoming when new
methods were introduced. Tests using a tamper-proof camera and a stereo Polaroid setup to estimate
depth and distance yielded less dramatic results. It’s almost as if the phenomenon became shy or
selective when asked to provide “proof”—a tendency often reported in similar cases

(p66)

this i believe is the crux of the ufo phenomena, as this pattern extends not only to attempts to gather physical objective evidence, but through the structure and efficacy of institutional investigation. in short, nothing gets anywhere, even if it's something. could disclosure happen even if everyone wanted it to? sometimes i wonder.

[DanZarfati]

Yeah, it seems to work, as staged events, as evolving patterns. Creating fissures among ppl, those who know and those who don't. The core issue is for what. That put as back to existential endless loops. 
However, there are many nuances to deal with it. 
Regarding what ppl call "disclosure", I think it is a facade, and it is quite useless to ppl who are deep into the phenomenon, we already know it is real, they could deliver more data, what can help to shape our perceptions, or shapening what we know even further, but the core is very unatainable in a broader perspective IMO.