Covid.gov has a new look

[Thoughtful3]

To understand how important the numbers are I suggest that you make up a chart starting from 2018 to 2030. Then list the Gates children ages by year. You'll notice a trend.
Jennifer Gates- birthdate April [26] 1996. She was [23] in 2019 the start of the plandemic.
Rory Gates birthdate is May [23], 1999.
Phoebe Gates birthdate is September [14] and she will be 23 this year 20[25].

Now add the two grandchildren.
Leila March 5, 20[23] and 
MIA (missing in action I assume since Billy like to play weird word games). October 16, 2024.

Another book to read is "How to Prevent the Next Pandemic" by Bill Gates.
This thriller is his dream of the GERM team ready to be deployed and conduct drills.
The book has [25]0 pages.
His birthday is October [28]...October is the 10th month. The book costs $28.

I had a tough time getting this "Disease X- The 100 Days Mission to END Pandemics" by Kate Kelland. [25] pounds.
This book is loaded with all the key numbers especially [17].

There is no question that there are some big plans for June 23, 2025.

[chr0naut]

Trump is a builder that became President. If you are looking at him for your medical advice, you need restraining.

On a side note from our discourse on another related thread. Evidence has been presented that does prove that the workers at the Wuhan Lad did fall sick to a mystery illness in the months to the lead up of the Wet market out break. It was around the same time that the USA and Canadian participants of the Wuhan Military Games also got sick with a new mystery illness. Also around the time Event 201 was underway. Hmm...

Those workers who did fall sick in 2019 were RAT tested daily in 2020 for antibodies to COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. If they had been ill with COVID-19, and had recovered, they would have had antibodies to the virus. None of them had antibodies to the virus in 2020, so they couldn't have been sick with COVID-19 in 2019.

New information on Wuhan researchers’ illness furthers debate on pandemic origins

The person so-far identified as earliest occurrence of COVID-19 (patient zero) had no direct physical connection to either the lab or the seafood market. So the origins and early spread of the virus remain a mystery, but neither the lab nor market appear to be the true origin based upon evidence.

1st known case of coronavirus traced back to November in China

The lab workers probably just had a seasonal flu (if they did actually fall ill. There is still some doubt about the 'intel') but that sort of thing happens a lot.

The fact that the website is highly politicized propaganda, and nothing to do with health advice, is that it shows a picture of a politician. (Perhaps the website is suggesting that he is the true source of the virus?)

[MichSwampbuck]

Long time lurker. just wanted to say thanks for the energy you put into this timeline link! Ive been worried Ai is going to monitor "disinformation" spreaders and scrub the internet but folks like you are out there making it difficult. i came across a website called frontiers where an article describes how users on X (twitter at the time) were being tracked and their outreach monitored for spreading the documentary "plandemic" back in 2021 so i can only imagine yer name is on a list now that Ai is advancing those tactics! good luck out there!

I went beyond creating a forum board on a free server (outside the US) to contain my research. I made off-line copies of the webpages and stored them along with other information on a cloud server as well as on my private LAN where it is stored on two home computers and a storage drive.

That timeline is a small part of the research I did on subjects that would receive a lot of scrutiny. Mostly I have pandemic information along with socialist/communist influences at the dead drop. The lists I was working on, the ones with full profiles of the swamp critters, I believe those would be of particular interest to TPTB.

I monitor that forum, but nothing happens there and I don't necessarily want traffic. Anyone is welcome to comment, even Guests, however, with so much going on and the pressure relief on free speech about "conspiracies" lately, I haven't been dropping reports there in a long time. The few members hardly ever comment either.

[xuenchen]

I like this part:

EcoHealth — under the leadership of Dr. Peter Daszak — used U.S. taxpayer dollars to facilitate dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. After the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth violating the terms of its National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) commenced official debarment proceedings and suspended all funding to EcoHealth.
 
New evidence also shows that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has opened an investigation into EcoHealth’s pandemic-era activities.

from The COVID.gov site *COVID.gov*
 

[xuenchen]

How do you know for sure who the person identified as patient zero is? 

 

Those workers who did fall sick in 2019 were RAT tested daily in 2020 for antibodies to COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2. If they had been ill with COVID-19, and had recovered, they would have had antibodies to the virus. None of them had antibodies to the virus in 2020, so they couldn't have been sick with COVID-19 in 2019.

The person identified as patient zero had no direct physical connection to either the lab or the seafood market.

1st known case of coronavirus traced back to November in China

The lab workers probably just had a seasonal flu. That sort of thing happens a lot.

The fact that the website is highly politicized propaganda, and nothing to do with health advice, is that it shows a picture of a politician. (Perhaps the website is suggesting that he is the true source of the virus?)

[Thoughtful3]

Not to leave out Melinda French Gates-

https://us.macmillan.com/books/978125031...entoflift/

Very odd timing. April [23], 2019. Moment of lift to what exactly?

It is also very interesting to note what pages these books start on. 
"Moonshot- Inside Pfizer's nine-month Race to Make the Impossible Possible." by Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer.

Chapter 1 starts on Page 3 and ends on page [14].
Chapter 2 starts on Page [17] and ends on page [28].
As for the two and done...
page [23] "Mikael knew from previous discussions that THE SPEED OF DEVELOPMENT AND THE ABILITY TO BOOST FREQUENTLY WERE VERY HIGH PRIORITIES FOR ME..:
"I ALSO KNEW THAT THAT A VIRUS WITH THESE CHARACTERISTICS WOULD MUTATE SOONER RATHER THAN LATER . IT WAS IMPORTANT TO HAVE A VACCINE THAT WE COULD BOOST AS OFTEN AS NEEDED WITHOUT FEAR OF LOSING POTENCY."
Page 52 inverse of [25] Bourla discusses the selection process of which vaccine candidate should be selected. "80% oof the data we had was from b1, and we couldn't afford the time to develop additional data for b2. It was true substantial work would be required of Pfizer to take the the b2 construct and make it commercially viable- to manufacture it at scale with consistency. "
what did he chose?
"Let's go with the b2 candidate and hope we are right."

[Thoughtful3]

Another key, key book is "Uncontrolled Spread" by Scott Gottlieb, former FDA Commissioner, who just happened to leave in 2019 and joined the Pfizer board. Then went on TV promoting the jab.

It has been written in a convoluted manner making it more difficult to follow. But the numbers and the loathing of the other agencies such as the CDC...They hang themselves.
Chapter 1 begins on page [14] and ends on page [25].
Chapter 2 begins on page[26].

Also if you look at #[11]- According to Gottlieb Wuhan is a city with [11] million people and the woman who became ill with Covid went to hospital #[11]. 
Tedros declared the plandemic March 11, 2020. Biden ended the plandemic on the [11] and the CDC ended it formally a month later on the [11].

https://www.gavi.org/news/media-room/gav...-programme
December 5[17], 2019. Just some food for thought.

[putnam6]

The fact that the website is highly politicized propaganda, and nothing to do with health advice, is that it shows a picture of a politician. (Perhaps the website is suggesting that he is the true source of the virus?)

As opposed to using highly politicized propaganda, CNN and an article from 2020

Rand Paul can be a bulldog on issues like this.

https://x.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1913123056781849044…  BOMBSHELL: RAND PAUL SAYS HE HAS THE EVIDENCE TO BRING DOWN FAUCI  “I have PROOF that Dr. Fauci went around the Safety Committee to fund the Wuhan Lab... and I have EMAILS that show he KNEW it was ‘Gain of Function Research.’” — Senator Rand Paul (2023)  This isn’t speculation.  This is direct evidence of a cover-up at the highest level. Fauci didn’t just approve the research — He knew the risks… and funded it anyway. Then spent years lying to Congress and the world.  If this proof holds — It’s not just a scandal. It’s a criminal conspiracy that may have led to the greatest global catastrophe of our time. The truth is coming. And Fauci should be very, very worried.

further perspective

18 and older Americans are currently vaccinated at around 20%. Nobody cares, but in reality, we won't know who is right, depending on what we are exposed to next and when.

Ive already had a nasty respiratory illness for a good 2 weeks, Covid did cross my mind. But the pollen count was high, and a Zyrtec and saline nose spray does wonders, loads of garlic too

[Kwaka]

Those workers who did fall sick in 2019 were RAT tested daily in 2020 for antibodies to COVID-19/SARS-CoV-2.

RAT tests are most effective when someone is going through an infection Otherwise, if there sensitive enough to pick up the immune memory of a past infection, then once someone tests positive once, they will continue to always test positive many years after.

As for getting access to all the medical files of who had what when would make the picture a lot clearer of how this monster got out of its cage. With China going 'Fahrenheit 451' on the matter, progress has been slow.

[Kwaka]

this "new look" on this covid.gov seems so inflammatory by calling out the previous administration, fauci and other elected officials and suggesting a coverup BUT the Final Report of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic Committee on Oversight and Accountability straight up says the operation warp speed was a success.

I do agree that is one part of the Committee's contents that is more political in nature. Until RFK can get a more accurate picture of the vaccination cost / benefit out, hard to say just how successful the product was in its aims.

With all the censorship, discrediting and gaslighting of vaccination induced victims, situation looks a lot worst than the few cases the health authorities had to accept. The 'Safe and Effective' pitch has not withstood the test of time. Some people are still getting booster shots, others don't want any more.

I don't know where the state of mRNA tech was at the start of Warp Speed and just how much it changed when released to the public. The DEFUSE project did have this kind of technology as a counter measure. Was it just the administrative process that had to discredit other available treatments to get the Emergency Use Authorization passed the hard part in Warp Speed? Or was a lot of infrastructure built to upscale mRNA tech for mass production the successful part?