Epstein tapes are locked away: Virginia Giuffre's co-writer

[LightAngel]

Amy Wallace, co-writer of Virginia Giuffre's memoir, "Nobody's Girl," joins NewsNation's "Banfield" to detail her knowledge of the names on Epstein's client list and whether President Trump had any involvement. She tells Ashleigh Banfield the tapes with specific names exist but "no one will be able to find them."

[Thoughtful3]

I picked up her book yesterday and am currently reading it. It is a very sobering read.
Sexual abuse started very early by her father. Virginia ended up being placed in a a boot camp to modify her behavior called Growing Together.
It sounds like a horrific place to live and she was there for years. More sexual abuse. She tried numerous times to escape.

I'm still reading it.

[cherokeetroy]

Link

[Vermilion]

If she was really "beaten and raped" by a "well-known prime minister," why did Virginia Roberts Giuffre keep this secret for 14 years? Because she started making sensational claims about prominent people in 2011. Between 2011 and 2025, she initiated a slew of litigation, did numerous media interviews, and even wrote a PREVIOUS memoir (that her lawyers later had to admit was "fictionalized.") So if this new claim were remotely valid, why isn't the Prime Minister named, so the veracity of the claim can be investigated and corroborated?

We're now told she's deceased, so the rationalization can't be that she feared for her "safety," unless the claim is that she can be harmed in the afterlife. Why didn't the ghostwriter of this new "memoir" include the name of the supposed Prime Minister who committed a brutally violent rape?

Surely, the ghostwriter (Amy Wallace) must have taken steps to corroborate the credibility of the claim before she put it in the book, right? She must know who this Prime Minister is? Why doesn't someone ask Amy Wallace to disclose the identity of the Prime Minister? Where and when did this alleged attack occur?

Because anyone who's remotely informed and impartial would know that Virginia Roberts Giuffre has fabricated an endless series of claims like this before, and was forced to retract virtually all of them that were ever tested for truth-value.

She couldn't have possibly done it again to sell a book, right?

The US prosecutor refused to use Virginia's testimony in both Epstein's and Ghislaine's prosecution because she is a serial liar.

https://x.com/mtracey/status/1980292281421770852

[RazorV66]

Link

[Image: https://i.imgur.com/ms8wfgY.jpeg]

She is obviously guessing the names. 

Where's Trump's name?

[cherokeetroy]

If she was really "beaten and raped" by a "well-known prime minister," why did Virginia Roberts Giuffre keep this secret for 14 years? Because she started making sensational claims about prominent people in 2011. Between 2011 and 2025, she initiated a slew of litigation, did numerous media interviews, and even wrote a PREVIOUS memoir (that her lawyers later had to admit was "fictionalized.") So if this new claim were remotely valid, why isn't the Prime Minister named, so the veracity of the claim can be investigated and corroborated?

We're now told she's deceased, so the rationalization can't be that she feared for her "safety," unless the claim is that she can be harmed in the afterlife. Why didn't the ghostwriter of this new "memoir" include the name of the supposed Prime Minister who committed a brutally violent rape?

Surely, the ghostwriter (Amy Wallace) must have taken steps to corroborate the credibility of the claim before she put it in the book, right? She must know who this Prime Minister is? Why doesn't someone ask Amy Wallace to disclose the identity of the Prime Minister? Where and when did this alleged attack occur?

Because anyone who's remotely informed and impartial would know that Virginia Roberts Giuffre has fabricated an endless series of claims like this before, and was forced to retract virtually all of them that were ever tested for truth-value.

She couldn't have possibly done it again to sell a book, right?

The US prosecutor refused to use Virginia's testimony in both Epstein's and Ghislaine's prosecution because she is a serial liar.

https://x.com/mtracey/status/1980292281421770852

"If you believe the girls, you have to believe it all, even the good things about Trump. If you don’t believe the girls well that goes against #believeallgirls.
So what’s it’s going to be?
Believe the girls and Trump looks good or…
Don’t believe the girls and Trump doesn’t look good but you look bad."

[Vermilion]

She is obviously guessing the names. 

Where's Trump's name?

Yup, this Epstein hoax has turned into massive grifts.
Guiffres book, more “victims” lawsuits, and now this lady throwing common sense to the wind and is trying to get sued just for a few clicks.

[Vermilion]

"If you believe the girls, you have to believe it all, even the good things about Trump. If you don’t believe the girls well that goes against #believeallgirls.
So what’s it’s going to be?
Believe the girls and Trump looks good or…
Don’t believe the girls and Trump doesn’t look good but you look bad."

I stand by that.

Have you chosen yet?

[cherokeetroy]

I stand by that.

Have you chosen yet?

"why did Virginia Roberts Giuffre keep this secret for 14 years? Because she started making sensational claims about prominent people in 2011. Between 2011 and 2025, she initiated a slew of litigation, did numerous media interviews, and even wrote a PREVIOUS memoir (that her lawyers later had to admit was "fictionalized."

[cherokeetroy]

Yup, this Epstein hoax has turned into massive grifts.
Guiffres book, more “victims” lawsuits, and now this lady throwing common sense to the wind and is trying to get sued just for a few clicks.

She won't get sued

Melania didn't even sue Hunter like she threatened to