07-10-2024, 11:53 AM
This is the problem with 'social engineering' in government.
"Departments" shouldn't act as political arms for parties. But this is part and parcel with "political-appointees," (no surprises there.)
It was bad enough when the government 'decided' that they are now allowed to "influence" media to "affect public understanding and dialog"... now our oath-sworn 'servants of the people' represent only the "parties" that appoint them... not the will of the citizens.
"Private" commerce broke the peoples' government... everything's for sale... including 'facts.'
"Departments" shouldn't act as political arms for parties. But this is part and parcel with "political-appointees," (no surprises there.)
It was bad enough when the government 'decided' that they are now allowed to "influence" media to "affect public understanding and dialog"... now our oath-sworn 'servants of the people' represent only the "parties" that appoint them... not the will of the citizens.
"Private" commerce broke the peoples' government... everything's for sale... including 'facts.'
