Why Does One Family Fund All Climate Hysteria?

[Karl12]

Suppose it's a pretty fair question and have posted this content on the board in different places before but never in one place.

It's a fact that literally one family funds all climate hysteria - just why is that?

Here's well respected 'mainstream' journalist Elizabeth Dickson on the question.

Quite refreshing to see.

The Rockefellers created 990 "Climate Change" institutions, foundations, and activist groups

Every time you hear a "climate change" scare story, that person was PAID. He is a Rockefeller stooge. He may not know it; but his profession has been entirely corrupted.

Also here's Swedish Ph.D researcher Jacob Nordangard on the subject - apparently years ago the Rockefellers employed a Tavistock 'psychoanalyst' to deceive everyone that excess CO2 is an 'ecological toxin'.

To my mind the quote found in this short video is one of the most important of the last 100 years:

• "And therein lies our current opportunity."

Amazing how the usual suspects pop up time and time again in certain endeavours and how modern day child adults ignore it.

Regarding 'following the money' there's a more in depth examination from Nordangard below showing how the Rockefellers have 'funded almost everything regarding climate'.




• Rockefeller - Controlling the Game


From 4:00





Let's be honest this is all (very probably) about 'control' - the exact same family are involved in countless anti-human 'eugenic' atrocities and were actively funding the Nazis (and the SS and IG Farben) 'during' WW2.. so therefore not very credible.

[Karl12]

For folks who are interested in the money angle then there are a 100 trillion reasons here.

For those that are not (including me) then apparently you and your family are worth 'nothing' so watch this:


5:00

:beer:

[Byrd]

It's a fact that literally one family funds all climate hysteria - just why is that?

This is a really badly researched article.

Let's run some numbers (if you don't mind.)  Nickson's article covers 80 (roughly) years of the Rockefeller family history and doesn't explain that the family fortune was built on oil (note: the CAUSE of climate change problems) and a lot of other things.  It "kind of" picks up with the four Rockefeller brothers (doesn't explain) this when they formed the Rockefeller Foundation in 1940 but dodges back to collect some things from one brother or another (including decrying some of the ("modern architecture") buildings they commissioned, while ignoring other buildings of the same type built by others in the same areas at the same time and completely omitting buildings (many libraries) built in many different styles)  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_family

Nickson, as a journalist, should know this isn't honest.

The 990 institutions they "have their fingers in" covers 80 to 100 years.  That's a total of investing in 9-10 institutions per year.  There's no list of 990, Nickson just simply produces the number, relying on one author (Norgangard) as being accurate.  She shows part of a table purporting to be "Things The Rockefellers set up" and includes (and she rails against) the Atomic Energy Commission (via Norgangard) which clearly was NOT set up by them or funded by them and the Kettering Foundation (set up by Kettering, not the Rockefellers), the Ford Foundation (set up by Henry Ford) etc.

The Atomic Energy Commission has nothing to do with Rockefellers unless you want a very weak tie by saying a few scientists of theirs went to a college that had a building funded by Rockefeller and had some Rockefeller grants.

Why didn't she smack Norgangard for including foundations that clearly have nothing to do with the Rockefellers but were instead set up by other wealthy individuals?  Why does she neglect to say that the moneyed rich of those eras reduced their taxes by setting up foundations that anyone could approach to ask for funds?  

People who give money to research groups don't go over every single paper or proposal of every scientist in that group.  If you give money to the Foundation For Free Fribbles and your foundation gives money to a Trudeau Hugging Group, this does not mean that you founded the Trudeau Hugging Group or that they owe you anything or that you directed their research.

It's a badly researched screed.  I expect better from journalists.


(also, they got their start in oil, as I said, owning one of the biggest oil monopolies in the world. And the environmental movement didn't begin until Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring" book came out.  Climate change is even newer than that.)