05-31-2024, 02:16 PM
This post was last modified 05-31-2024, 11:48 PM by BeyondKnowledge. 
(05-31-2024, 01:58 PM)K218b Wrote: It shouldn't be this way. A conviction is a conviction and someone, anyone, no matter who they are, even if they have been in office for years they should get a fair trial and if evidence presented and they are guilty then they should be convicted of the crimes they were charged with.
You are assuming the coviction was proper and legal. We will not know that until the appeal is over.
Does anyone know the minimum safe distance of ignorance?