DOJ Officer Caught Saying They Will Remove All Republicans In Epstein List

[Vermilion]

The Trump administration and DOJ not releasing any more of the thousands of files, redacting names, and referring to as a hoax is not allowing anyone to get to the evidence.
It's funny that some members are quick to claim cover ups with previous administrations, but not when it comes Epstein, I wonder why???

Not releasing any more?
Not a very good argument since they just released another 33,000 pages.
There are many reasons to redact names.
This is standard in all cases and not novel to the Epstein stuff.
Victims, potential victims, and innocent people certainly need not be slimed by the government.
It’s actual DOJ policy, since forever, to not divulge the names of not guilty people.
There has been no evidence of any coverup that hasn’t already been adjudicated.(the banks already paid out millions for the cover up)
Epstein’s butler also got in trouble for trying to sell his black book list of the girls.
Iirc, he did prison time too.

[Kurokage]

Not releasing any more?
Not a very good argument since they just released another 33,000 pages.
There are many reasons to redact names.
This is standard in all cases and not novel to the Epstein stuff.
Victims, potential victims, and innocent people certainly need not be slimed by the government.
It’s actual DOJ policy, since forever, to not divulge the names of not guilty people.
There has been no evidence of any coverup that hasn’t already been adjudicated.(the banks already paid out millions for the cover up)
Epstein’s butler also got in trouble for trying to sell his black book list of the girls.
Iirc, he did prison time too.

Seeing as a lot of the 'released' files aren't actually anything new (2nd time this has happened!). You may want to ask yourself why Trump keeps claiming it's all a hoax??

[Vermilion]

Seeing as the 'released' files aren't actually anything new (2nd time this has happened!). You may want to ask yourself why Trump keeps claiming it's all a hoax??

I’m sure most of those 33,000 were new to the detractors here seeing as they continually prove they know little about the case.
Nobody has a running list of what exactly has been released vs what has not been released.
The democrats keep telling everyone that Trump is hiding evidence of Epstein’s blackmail scheme and co-conspirators.
Trump is not hiding that.
There is no client list.
There are no co-conspirators.
That’s the hoax.
Similar to the Russia hoax and all the others.
The hoax believers should ask themselves why theyre so susceptible to these hoaxes.
They swallow every one and are wrong each time.
Random probability says they’d be on the correct side 50% of the time, but they’re at 0%.
Seems like an honest question intense internal audit would be good for them.

[ReturnofBroccoli]

Someone must have raised a red flag some where for her to investigate Schnitt in the first place, as an acting deputy chief in the US Department of Justice’s Office of Enforcement Operations, even if not directly involved, he would of known to some degree what was happening with the Epstein investigation. Maybe someone within the DOJ though the DOJ had become biased??

It's seems that bragging about doing something possibly illegal is now seen as ok? It's not about oppressing his opinion, it's about his mindset and those around him in their 'official' capacity, and whether that is effecting their ability to remain neutral 'on the job'.

I disagree I think an "aspiring journalist" found an easy "mark" and played him for a fool and asked him targeted questions and he responded in a way he thought she wanted to hear based on said questioning. She honeypotted him. He was catfished. I think its hilarious personally lol. Kind of degrading she stooped to that but meh, wasn't me. I can guarantee you though, if he had gave anything other than his personal bs, the doj would of taken him out real quick via forced resignation. The system protects itself. It has no problems throwing anything or anyone to the wolves. Just because he is biased doesnt mean his work is. Thats reaching and its definitely what this Jezebel is trying to sell because thats what sells, so do you buy it? What do you gain from reselling it :p im not buying it mister! This dude just got caught with his pants down lol its pretty funny

[Kurokage]

It appears that Trump supporters are also trying to detract from the tons of evidence that hasn't been released as yet.
Towing the party line does nothing but help guilty parties on both sides cover up the facts.
Your blaming of democrats for swallowing the party-line is exactly what you're doing here.

The DOJ and Trump administration claiming hoax whilst still keeping thousands of files/recordings hidden is exactly why people with affiliation to all parties are claiming a cover up.  Not just opposition.

[Kurokage]

I disagree I think an "aspiring journalist" found an easy "mark" and played him for a fool and asked him targeted questions and he responded in a way he thought she wanted to hear based on said questioning. She honeypotted him. He was catfished. I think its hilarious personally lol. Kind of degrading she stooped to that but meh, wasn't me. I can guarantee you though, if he had gave anything other than his personal bs, the doj would of taken him out real quick via forced resignation. The system protects itself. It has no problems throwing anything or anyone to the wolves. Just because he is biased doesnt mean his work is. Thats reaching and its definitely what this Jezebel is trying to sell because thats what sells, so do you buy it? What do you gain from reselling it :p im not buying it mister! This dude just got caught with his pants down lol its pretty funny

I agree he may have been honeypotted' by the journalist, but someone must have bought up Schnitt or the possibility of him bragging about what was happening in the DOJ, to be 'singled out' like he was. Also forcing him out from his position now, would then be seen as an admission of guilt. He may have kept his post/position purely to appear not guilty.

[cherokeetroy]

[ReturnofBroccoli]

I agree he may have been honeypotted' by the journalist, but someone must have bought up Schnitt or the possibility of him bragging about what was happening in the DOJ, to be 'singled out' like he was. Also forcing him out from his position now, would then be seen as an admission of guilt. He may have kept his post/position purely to appear not guilty.

To fire him for expressing his opinion outside the work place would have been unjustified and probably illegal. We can send the Journalist an email and ask her how he became a target.

[Vermilion]

I agree he may have been honeypotted' by the journalist, but someone must have bought up Schnitt or the possibility of him bragging about what was happening in the DOJ, to be 'singled out' like he was. Also forcing him out from his position now, would then be seen as an admission of guilt. He may have kept his post/position purely to appear not guilty.

He’s not guilty of anything other than trying to get in her pants LoL
You realize he didn’t deny anything he said.
He said nothing that he didn’t read in a Bloomberg article.
He knows nothing about that investigation because his work at the DOJ was completely unrelated.
Another swing and a miss.
Keep trying champ.
It’s amusing.

[Vermilion]

To fire him for expressing his opinion outside the work place would have been unjustified and probably illegal. We can send the Journalist an email and ask her how he became a target.

If I had to guess why he was a target, I’d say he was just a target of opportunity.
These Honeypot schemes only work on government related single dudes who they can actually find and identify on those dating apps.
Probably a minuscule amount of those that fit all of that criteria to even start the op.
Finding an intelligent smoke show is the hard part LoL