(06-17-2024, 08:50 PM)FlyingClayDisk Wrote: Your Honor, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury, we have presented the facts in this case fairly and honestly. We believe these facts both answer and satisfy the questions which have been brought before us in this trial. You have been given many things to consider. Some of these things are complex and unpleasant. We ask not that you side with emotion, but rather that you side with reason. And, we are confident that as you examine these facts in your deliberations, you will find the Defendant...NOT GUILTY.
Thank you.
Your Honor, the Defense rests.
Who is the defendant here? Hamas, Palestine, Israel?
As for the verdict, I'd be more inclined towards Guilty but mentally ill, it seems to fit the region.
I'll try and end my involvement here with this point.
If we were to snap our fingers and put a Palestinian state the size of the West Bank and Gaza on the border of your current state how would you feel about that? Would the now US Palestinians accept Jewish Americans?
Now instead of doing that with a Palestinian state how about doing the same with Israel, remembering that 2 million Muslims live in Israel now.
You see where Im going with this...
Guilty but mentally ill
His mind was not for rent to any god or government, always hopeful yet discontent. Knows changes aren't permanent, but change is ....
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart
Professor Neil Ellwood Peart