Login to account Create an account  


Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Classical Vs Contemporary
#3
I often think on the possibility that we (as in 'humans') have inherited a sense of the 'parameters' of the infinite.

Hermetic philosophies have frequently been presented as 'secrets.'  Maybe because cultural biases and pressures forced those studying them to isolate themselves and their studies (to become "hermetic.")

Now some people used that moniker to foster an air of "mystery" over the topics, but effectively they may have been so far ahead of the "mainstream" as to render their ideas into an air of "so exotic as to be nonsense."

I remember Tesla, in particular, trying to assert - and remaining virtually unheard - that the factual "key" to accessing the infinite energy permeating everywhere was "vibrations and harmony."  I can't help but find the direction of modern science following his footsteps... all while still 'labeling' Tesla as "not entirely all there."  He demonstrated so many principles that have been fed upon by so many... but when he said "the people of the entire planet will have all the power they could ever possibly need, virtually for free" he was rendered anathema in his own society.  Yet today, if all of his discoveries were magically eliminated, billions of our world might be dead.

Most of the principle I was alluding to were  the ilk of the Vedas, bodies of work of Hermeticism, and even others less well known... (and there are so many that I don't know about... I'm far removed from the notional title "expert.")

From early on it has been somehow reported in what we call "antiquity" that the nature of our reality is not simple material interaction... that understanding came from somewhere... it was not now, nor has it ever been "discovered;"  because we've been talking about this for ages.  "Science" historians have sidelined too many concepts and ideas over what they could reproduce locally, and it is costing us time...

The continuous cross connection between all things that exist is another 'migration' science thinkers have exhibited... while maintaining it's their own genius that's responsible for the 'discovery.'

But for some reason scientist seem to be hesitant to tackle "chirality"... we'll soon see if the ancient thinkers had indeed already 'gone there' - not that the science community will ever acknowledge that.

Hmm.. why am I sounding so cynical?  I'm not really... perhaps it's a writing "mood."

Thanks so much for opening up this topic!   Thumbup Beer
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Classical Vs Contemporary - by CCoburn - 10-06-2024, 07:28 PM
RE: Classical Vs Contemporary - by UltraBudgie - 10-06-2024, 08:12 PM
RE: Classical Vs Contemporary - by Maxmars - 10-06-2024, 08:25 PM
RE: Classical Vs Contemporary - by UltraBudgie - 10-07-2024, 10:52 AM


TERMS AND CONDITIONS · PRIVACY POLICY