8 hours ago
(04-20-2025, 10:58 PM)annonentity Wrote: I reply that they are pulling them out of living people. I add they are a novel and have only come to the mortician's attention since covid. You reply they are lying someone certainly is trying to obscure the truth but we are not that sure who.
There are a lot of reasons for clots in the living -- but a mortician can't tell if a clot was present when the person was alive (and was not a cause of death) or if it happened as part of the death process (that was mentioned in one of the links I provided, I think.)
And the only way you could tell the difference is through a microscope (mentioned in that same article.)
Pathologists would use microscope on samples. Morticians don't do this. Morticians wouldn't have a cause of death and a list of "other conditions" -- the pathologist would. Morticians wouldn't know if the patient had one of these problems (https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/di...ble-states)
Also, what's the source for "worldwide" claims? Speaking from experience (I was in medical school as a teaching assistant), weekly journal reviews that are part of the usual process in training physicians (students sit down and read through a lot of research and present "here's something wild and unusual") catch weird things like this. I was the one in my journal club that caught the two papers published almost simultaneously about Kaposi's sarcoma in gay men -- the start of the identification of the AIDS epidemic.
It's not always a paper; sometimes it's in the form of letters of comment.
So... where are the published reports by pathologists and physicians about this? There should be a lot of this, and it should be global and impossible to cover up.
