05-15-2024, 03:43 PM
I honestly believe that a large part of the confused understanding of this has to do with its reporting and the casual abuse of "marketing strategies" employed by those with a platform. We often suffer from weak educational efforts, study as hard as one might, if the teaching is flawed the lessons' outcome will be flawed.
The entire point of the development is a newer framework for technological applications. Based upon a recently explored developments in materials science, new opportunities have arisen. Chief among them as a worry is the effect that the new modality of data processing allows for kind of theoretically destroys the soundness of relying on earlier encryption methods.
For us, the entire notion of "encryption" rarely extends beyond simple 'privacy' matters (and how commerce "consumes" us.)
Government are relying on security technology, now they are threatened because: "secrets" that reflect "capabilities," "projects," "indications of intent," and also (and often) the 'private' machinations of their leadership. So for them, this is an "all call" for attention.
I offer up a thought for your consideration; How many times in history has the development of a new technology "panicked" governments?
All we see from their marketing is the projection of fear, the clamoring for money, the projection of dread. All because they must now use 'defense monies' to update their technology... rather than... well, you fill in the blank.
The entire point of the development is a newer framework for technological applications. Based upon a recently explored developments in materials science, new opportunities have arisen. Chief among them as a worry is the effect that the new modality of data processing allows for kind of theoretically destroys the soundness of relying on earlier encryption methods.
For us, the entire notion of "encryption" rarely extends beyond simple 'privacy' matters (and how commerce "consumes" us.)
Government are relying on security technology, now they are threatened because: "secrets" that reflect "capabilities," "projects," "indications of intent," and also (and often) the 'private' machinations of their leadership. So for them, this is an "all call" for attention.
I offer up a thought for your consideration; How many times in history has the development of a new technology "panicked" governments?
All we see from their marketing is the projection of fear, the clamoring for money, the projection of dread. All because they must now use 'defense monies' to update their technology... rather than... well, you fill in the blank.
