Yesterday, 10:54 AM
(Yesterday, 10:44 AM)LightAngel Wrote: I also posted this topic on ATS.
And the debate has already started there.
This is extremely important.
Sadly, as a non-ATS member, I cannot participate there... but I agree on the importance of the recent developments.
It is important in many different ways, not least of all to the people who will happen to be when and where the missiles land. And I expect that most of those people are not combatants or drivers of the conflict itself.
I do object to the idea that this is a "Biden" thing. "Biden" hasn't made a decision on his own since before his election at least.
I propose that these 'US actions' have lately been the product of a "party committee"... I would add "unelected" to that phrase if I didn't already know people are mostly enamored of hating on political celebrity's thinking they are the "architects" they often posture as being.
This war is the revenue source of many powerful people... people with plans for 'development' and 'commerce' when the dust settles... while they 'facilitate' arms sales and international political posturing for fun and profit.