3 |
98 |
| JOINED: |
Apr 2025 |
| STATUS: |
OFFLINE
|

I have my gut opinions. I am all for separation of church and state, but that also means i don't want politics being dragged into religion. And while the separation of church and state may be the stated goal of the BJC, they use political influence as their primary tool being based in Washington DC. And are quick to endorse liberal ideals and to oppose conservative ones. Now as to Christian Nationalism. Is a resurgence of conservative Christian values into mainstream religious ideology necessarily bad if it leads to strengthening the Christian religion? Charlie Kirk was called on sharing some of those beliefs, yet he sought to talk with any who opposed them and defended his own views and invited others to defend theirs in an open dialogue.
I saw the BJC defended Islam against " Islamophobia" but aren't they being phobic against Christian nationalists?
I think this group isn't the defender of freedom it claims to be, rather a progressive activist group using the guise of religious freedom. More like religious policing.