01-16-2025, 03:16 PM
(01-16-2025, 03:09 PM)quintessentone Wrote: As I stated previously, specifically referring to Facebook's removal of fact-checking, both sides of the political/science/whatever subject matter should be fact-checked first by the poster, provide a source, then the owners/moderators need to determine what is and what isn't to be accepted as fact on their site, then act accordingly to develop their T&C.
Having no fact-checking is simply opinion and closed-minded belief systems on show and I don't consider that debate. To me it's either misinformation or disinformation depending on the lack of research with sources, problematic fact-checking, or one's agenda, or ego (just needing to be right).
At the very least, a poster should provide a source for their stance so others can at the very least see if their source has an agenda that leans to one side or the other.
Quote: then the owners/moderators need to determine what is and what isn't to be accepted as fact on their site,Wow. Just.....wow. You want someone to tell you what to think and believe. We've seen way too much of that. I'd rather hear both sides and decide for myself, rather than being told what is or isn't "The Truth".
Who let the dogs out ? It was me.
