01-14-2025, 02:55 PM
This post was last modified 01-14-2025, 02:55 PM by SomeStupidName. Edited 1 time in total.
(01-14-2025, 02:38 PM)quintessentone Wrote: It can never be defined as a debate and my point, that you missed, is that if a site is leaning in a biased manner with moderators and members being the majority or leaning in a specific way, then there can be no free speech or proper discussions when the dog piling starts.
There can never be an agreement to disagree because of emotionally immature players and a lack of fairness and this could be from both players and usually is. This is why X.com is losing members because of biased moderation, or wishy-washy moderation by an owner accepting that he may be bi-polar - so don't get on his bad side if he woke up on the wrong side of the bed that day.
Facebook, to me, will devolve into a shitshow as I can't see any other way for it to go.
The social experiment that will now be Facebook
I find it odd you would put social media on such a pedestal that a civilized people should have or should ever look at it and think it was or ever will be anything more than a sewer pipe, they're not "communities". I feel like you were not around when computers were first connected to each other for entertainment purposes. The sewer debates will continue as they always have and I don't think anyone will be put off by the fact you don't define them as debates.
