A Superficial Analysis of Religion

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

So back to the ancients:
magical times everything was new and magic.
What has changed now is that we kind of have an idea of where we're coming from, what has happened before we were born.
That we build our worldview no longer only on what we experience directly but what others have put into convenient abstracts for us.

For this, I ripped off ideas from Dawkins, Darwin, Sagan, Jung, and theoretical physics, and then used it to explain concepts in world religions.

It leads to blasphemy. 

The Master of the universe (form) is an emergent property. The geometry is secondary and a random alignment from a set range of collapsed parameters that could happen.

The way these parameters end up is arbitrary to any one universe.

Like work down to a locational position through the multiverse  Everything is refined to incorporate possible laws of physics, possible universal histories, initial starting conditions on down to a 4D location.

So in effect all religions do is observe one tiny universal history and interpret that as the totality of all.

Like the universe with an interference force that prevents cohesion and exists like a plasma fuzz universe is one of their god's designs too.

And that's where the mindfuck is.

Multiverse theories deal with infinities of infinities. And if the arrangement of this selectively vibrating multiverse is from the infinite, there is no need to explain anything because EVERYTHING HAS TO HAPPEN. God is the process of everything having to happen.

We are just confined to one tiny little oberservable slice of infinity.

I think religions have every right to see a divine symmetry to our universe, because there is a design, math checking out observes their is form and law, I just take issue that it is significant in any way.

And I meant to give 5 stars for this. I suck at hitting the right one. 

ETA: