Yesterday, 05:44 AM
(06-18-2026, 11:28 AM)worldstarcountry Wrote: Warning, this is a very long written thread, with very long follow up posts submitting draft pieces of legislation written as such as well as the queries given to the AI assistant who made drafting it possible for research and educational purposes. Not for the feint of attention span.
Recently I have been dwelling on where we are now 26 years into the new century with regards to capabilities and the collective thinking process. Mostly I was wondering why it is we have not drafted any laws yet that will allow the private citizen who consents for collection of our entire lives' audio/video data for the purpose of "directed marketing and affiliate purposes " though our devices access to such data. The first such time I read about this in practice was an old book I read from 2000 by Arthur C Clarke called The Light of Other Days. Essentially a particular family working on some tech just discovered how to see into anywhere at anytime instantly, and eventually lead to be able to see the past as well.
I just took this as the instant capability of all internet connected devices with microphones and camera lenses eventually gaining that power in the coming years, which they now already have unfortunately. Eventually what happens in the book after the discovery, as that the government begins to use it for ... purposes . But they were being hush about it. Eventually I cannot recall if there was a movement, or a single person launched a lawsuit, but the courts finally get involved and subsequently the technology was used to clear people in court as well as track down the true culprits of crime.
I think enough people have seen trailers for the movie Mercy to see popular sentiment may in fact be going in this direction. The trailer I will present. This was actually a really good movie IMO with regards to showing the modern capabilities in the techno state we now live in. Worth your time if your into the CT stuff.
[Video: https://youtu.be/dSS4yqd0x6o]
So this was an extreme visualization that delegates the powers to an AI. However, the key point for the purpose of this thread is the data access. The real time and archival access to all that data that everyone was already consenting to be recorded so they can take selfies and make stupid tik tok videos, or feel safe at the drive-thru was accessible instantly without any obstacles and making anyone who refused liable for obstruction. In this way the innocent and the guilty alike could be cleared with evidence they did not even know to look for or account for.
I think it is the right time in our societies to take up this torch and demand legislative action that will return access to our own data back to us. So we can call out the liars on the spot and prove our own innocence against false accusations. Now hear me out, I have not said EVERYONE gets access TO EVERYONE else's data, this sis strictly data collected on our own devices, or devices in public where we were present. So the first person that opens with that is a non-thinking reactionary agent who did not finish reading. Try harder to utilize that brain please.
My goal is to create a community built piece of draft legislation that could be presentable as a proper submission to congress with a viral marketing campaign to inform the voting tax payer as well as all people subject to the laws of any particular jurisdiction. Expect heavy pushback from big tech and deep state slimeballs who thrive on extortion and blackmail. I did a fun version of this with a draft abortion reform law back on ATS in 2016, it was fun but it was just a fun project at the time.
However now that AI has developed the way it has, it has become a lot more useful to those of us who know how to ask it to change the world properly on a level we can easily jump start on the local level. So With the follow -up post, I am going to post the first rough draft of the official legalese version that was written with the very little criteria I added. I barely had to ask it anything to create this thing as you see it btw, and for full disclosure I will post that entire conversation leading up to the draft we see here for a better understanding of where I am coming from.
I had to factor things like, expectations in private settings vs open public. Whether it counts if I did not have a device but someone nearby did in fact have one and my audio data was collected in there, how it gets treated in court, and balancing some other variables. My criteria did not even include fee/fine structure for violations or even agencies responsible and timeline expectations, but the compute was able to generate so much of that from existing knowledge of how laws are structured I suppose. I was really impressed, and have not even read the entire draft yet. So That closes this post, the following will be the actual draft, and the next post after begins the conversation that lead up to the generation of this first draft. After that, I would sure love to collaborate with my fellow humans to study the draft, find irregularities, inconsistencies or just disagreements, and we work it out together. We fine tune it, run it back through the compute to make it really nice and pretty, and then I will pay a third party company to begin spamming this across social media as far and as wide as it can globally. I want 100 million views of this draft piece globally within 30 days of it being finalized into a proper piece worthy of being submitted to congress.
Sometimes it starts with one bold fucking idea, and the will to carry it through. I hope some of you are with me on this. There is little to zero physical effort required at all. We throw the seeds of disruption into the public ether, and then the universe and the millions of individuals with their own dreams and goals will carry it through the wind, scattering it far and wide in every coffee shop, board of directors, school, city council, state assembly, national parliaments, private think-tanks, and household around the world. An idea alone is one thing, but when an entire ready written piece of draft legislation that not only affects all technology using humans but the very access to the data they already know is being recorded, well that is a whole other can of worms altogether. Because at that point any nut can read it and say, "Hey, this actually makes sense, why the fuck isnt my representative carrying this torch?" well that thought will spark fires everywhere.
We have to help people remember the light is within them, and it can fuel a power that can change like an unstoppable supernova. Anyways enough with the hype, let me get to the meat and potatoes. if you are going to dream, always be sure you are dreaming bigger than the universe itself!
While I do appreciate human input and expression, I have no confidence in LLM (marketed as AI) output. Too frequently it is incorrect, which it presents with verbosity and absolute confidence. And LLM's do not (cannot) reveal their sources.
Besides, almost anyone can pose questions to an LLM and get similar output.
A well researched human report, with references and identified suppositions, is immensely superior to "AI slop".
Returning to the thread topic, the book "Permanent Record" by Edward Snowden outlines this particular topic with very specific instances of how human rights are being abused.
Support the Christchurch Call
