Las Vegas UFO Video Takes On New Plausibility

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

https://ktla.com/news/las-vegas-alien-vi...pert-says/

[Video: https://youtu.be/-s8RiQZGW5o?si=DI1UNjq6kZ101wvX]

So there's something that allegedly can't be explained in this video, and not where you'd expect it.

There's a 30% opaque 7 to 8 foot tall homind that is too tricky to add as an artifact and too perfectly integrated intuitively. You can watch multiple shadows react to its motion...

And also the triangulated "meteor", based on multiple videos, that pinpointed to the area of Angel's property, emitted no infrared signature, and made aerodynamic noise in sync with its luminosity.

There's so much to this one. Are they really pitstopping in Vegas backyards to break into tractors for parts?

Like I said elsewhere, it's like the smoking gun evidence that gets trolled.

[pianopraze]

Once you see it you can’t un-see it.

so the question in my mind is was it added later or was it in the footage reported at the time.

here is NN footage posted 10 months ago with cell phone video same clip. After watching your video you can see the cloaked figure clear as day in this old footage:

[Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Il-73JxKHSc]

[IdeomotorPrisoner]

That's what I did. Went to look for the original footage.

And then I tried to find another reason for that shadow. Camera artifact? The people backing out through gate? Why do other shadows move with the shape? The perfect shadow through cracks of the fence is hard to attribute to anything else but something behind the fence.

So who are these tall aliens, and why do they keep coming up? Should we fault them for originally working with The Third Reich?

This won't be the evidence it should be, maybe someone will yet debunk it with a simpler explanation than a cloaked figure.

The meteor is a trip too. The only thing he didn't cover was comparing another FLIR or infrared image of a meteor. While you'd think there should be a heat signature, it would have helped his video to show what a meteor's heat signature should look like.

Best I could find.

[Video: https://youtu.be/8qo-_-mpS14?si=W2W5QnZ5ubhK7yQ7]

And why is the sound so immediate? Isn't it 5 seconds a mile for sound to travel through air? I'm not sold on the sound being related to its streaking or alleged deceleration. If it is an associated sound it's from before the "fireball".

I think including the sound may have been a misstep. Or to think you should hear an atmospheric airburst immediately and use it as a persuasive argument.

What is compelling is the closest shot that looks like it plummets strait down and gives off a ring when it pulses. At 10:50 through 10:57 in OP video.

When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Still much to eliminate, I'm trying though.